Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Department Stores
Department Stores
Apparel - Retail
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Department Stores | Department Stores | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $388M | $1.61B | $5.34B | $19.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $15.53B | $22.62B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $271M | $642M | $610M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 36.1% | 36.5% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x | 8.8x | 31.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $2.45B | $5.20B | $3.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $674M | $1.25B | $1.23B |
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bed Bath & Beyond I… (BBBY) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Kohl's Corporation (KSS) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| Macy's, Inc. (M) | 100 | 302.4 | +202.4% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBBY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KSS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs BURL's +25.1%
M is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.42, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 1.42, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.49x
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 31.3x)
BURL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 440.2% 10Y total return vs M's -24.5%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1%
- 5.3% margin vs BBBY's -5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 31.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs BBBY's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs BBBY's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KSS's 3.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs BURL's +25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 10.3% vs -91.0% |
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BURL leads in 4 of 6 categories
KSS leads 1 • M leads 1 • BBBY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
M is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.6B annually — 21.3x BBBY's $1.1B. BURL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBBY's -5.8%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $15.5B | $22.6B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $1.2B | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $271M | $642M | $610M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$76M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $232M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +36.1% | +36.5% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +3.3% | +4.6% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +1.7% | +2.8% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +7.5% | +4.7% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -4.2% | -1.1% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.7% | +153.5% | +51.2% | +20.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, KSS trades at a 81% valuation discount to BURL's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KSS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BURL's 17.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $1.6B | $5.3B | $19.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $235M | $3.4B | $9.3B | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.80x | 6.06x | 8.29x | 32.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.26x | 8.79x | 31.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.80x | 4.83x | 17.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.10x | 0.24x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 0.41x | 1.09x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.46x | 5.05x | 113.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-32 for BBBY. BBBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to M's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KSS scores 7/9 vs BBBY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.4% | +6.9% | +14.2% | +29.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.3% | +2.0% | +4.0% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -91.0% | +4.6% | +8.7% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.8% | +4.8% | +8.7% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.61x | 1.07x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$153M | $1.8B | $4.0B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $674M | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.17x | 10.62x | 11.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BURL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in M five years ago would be worth $12,691 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $666 for BBBY. Over the past 12 months, KSS leads with a +127.8% total return vs BURL's +25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BURL at 18.9% vs BBBY's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.3% | -32.1% | -14.6% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | +127.8% | +72.1% | +25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.0% | -9.7% | +41.5% | +68.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | -64.8% | +26.9% | -7.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.2% | -25.3% | -24.5% | +440.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | -3.3% | +12.3% | +18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BURL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BURL is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBBY's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BURL currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs BBBY's 42.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 2.32x | 1.42x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.65 | $25.22 | $24.41 | $351.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.74 | $6.47 | $10.54 | $218.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.4% | +56.9% | +78.8% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 50.7 | 56.6 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 4.6M | 6.6M | 721K |
Analyst Outlook
M leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBBY as "Hold", KSS as "Hold", M as "Hold", BURL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for BBBY (target: $8) vs -0.2% for M (target: $19). For income investors, M offers the higher dividend yield at 3.71% vs KSS's 3.39%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $18.00 | $19.20 | $331.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 39 | 40 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% | +3.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.49 | $0.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +1.4% |
BURL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BBBY vs KSS vs M vs BURL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBBY or KSS or M or BURL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Kohl's Corporation (KSS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
On trailing P/E, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Burlington Stores, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Macy's, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
Over the past 5 years, Macy's, Inc.
(M) delivered a total return of +26. 9%, compared to -93. 3% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus BBBY's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning BBBY is approximately 140% more volatile than BURL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 107% for Macy's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kohl's Corporation grew EPS 144. 3% year-over-year, compared to 12. 1% for Macy's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -8. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BURL leads at 7. 3% versus -5. 9% for BBBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BURL leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBBY or KSS or M or BURL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Macy's, Inc.
(M) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Burlington Stores, Inc. — 22. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBBY: 44. 6% to $7. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBBY or KSS or M or BURL?
In this comparison, M (3.
7% yield), KSS (3. 4% yield) pay a dividend. BBBY, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BBBY or KSS or M or BURL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Macy's, Inc.
(M) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 7% yield). Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (M: -24. 5%, BBBY: -48. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBBY and KSS and M and BURL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; M is a small-cap deep-value stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KSS, M pay a dividend while BBBY, BURL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.