Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $180M | $1690.08T | $5.88B | $30.33B | $8.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $16.63B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-168M | $-464M | $1.39B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 26.1% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.0x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $22M | $98K | $16.17B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $374M | $194M | $714M | $1.98B | $214M |
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BridgeBio Oncology … (BBOT) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 240.6 | +140.6% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 12.14x
- Beta 0.96, current ratio 12.14x
- Beta 0.96 vs CRL's 1.44, lower leverage
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 190.9% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.6%
- +102.4% vs BBOT's -29.4%
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 16.0x)
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs CRL's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.4% vs BBOT's -29.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories
IMVT leads 1 • BBOT leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, IQV holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $16.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$166M | -$112M | -$487M | $3.5B | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$168M | -$464M | $1.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$95M | -$151M | -$423M | $2.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +26.1% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +13.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +8.3% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.2% | +91.5% | +19.7% | +15.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IQV's 13.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $180M | $1690.08T | $5.9B | $30.3B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$191M | $1690.08T | $5.2B | $44.5B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.78x | -0.75x | -10.60x | 22.79x | -61.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.96x | 16.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.98x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 1.86x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.65x | 6.20x | 4.68x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.79x | 16.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBOT scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.5% | -130.2% | -47.1% | +22.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.9% | -89.0% | -44.1% | +4.7% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.3% | — | — | +8.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.0% | -145.7% | -66.1% | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.13x | 0.00x | 2.44x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$371M | -$172M | -$714M | $14.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $374M | $194M | $714M | $2.0B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $22M | $98,000 | $16.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | — | 3.10x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $18,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +102.4% total return vs BBOT's -29.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.4% vs BBOT's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.7% | +3.6% | +11.7% | -20.7% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.4% | +100.5% | +102.4% | +16.6% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | +18.1% | +49.8% | -5.9% | -6.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | -68.3% | +84.4% | -22.8% | -46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.8% | -87.1% | +190.9% | +166.6% | +114.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | +5.7% | +14.4% | -2.0% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BBOT and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BBOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs BBOT's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.26x | 1.36x | 1.32x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.87 | $26.18 | $30.09 | $247.05 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.63 | $7.53 | $13.36 | $134.65 | $132.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +75.3% | +96.2% | +72.3% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 47.4 | 50.6 | 60.3 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 252K | 1.4M | 1.5M | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBOT as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 182.9% upside for BBOT (target: $22) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.67 | $46.33 | $45.50 | $223.75 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 23 | 44 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BBOT vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc. (BBOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +84. 4%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.
(BBOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning CRL is approximately 50% more volatile than BBOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IQVIA Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBOT: 182. 9% to $21. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BBOT or DBVT or IMVT or IQV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics Inc.
(BBOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBOT: -24. 8%, CRL: +114. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBOT and DBVT and IMVT and IQV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.