Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBW vs JAKK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
BBW vs JAKK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $486M | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $526M | $571M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 32.4% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $97M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $54M |
BBW vs JAKK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Build-A-Bear Worksh… (BBW) | 100 | 1649.3 | +1549.3% |
| JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) | 100 | 388.0 | +288.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBW vs JAKK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth 4.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 203.8% 10Y total return vs JAKK's -66.6%
JAKK is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.79, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.82x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.7x)
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BBW's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs JAKK's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.59 vs JAKK's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BBW's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.0% vs BBW's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs JAKK's 2.2%, ROIC 26.4% vs 4.1% |
BBW vs JAKK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBW vs JAKK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAKK and BBW operate at a comparable scale, with $571M and $526M in trailing revenue. BBW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JAKK's 1.7%. On growth, BBW holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $526M | $571M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $87M | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +32.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | +43.4% |
Valuation Metrics
JAKK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BBW trades at a 64% valuation discount to JAKK's 27.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBW's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JAKK's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $486M | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $556M | $305M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.85x | 27.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.70x | 7.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.86x | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.67x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBW delivers a 38.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $4 for JAKK. JAKK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBW's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBW scores 5/9 vs JAKK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.7% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.4% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.2% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $69M | $39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $97M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 32.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BBW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBW five years ago would be worth $53,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,151 for JAKK. Over the past 12 months, JAKK leads with a +30.0% total return vs BBW's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBW at 21.9% vs JAKK's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.2% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | +30.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.3% | +4.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +430.9% | +161.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.8% | -66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.9% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BBW and JAKK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BBW is the less volatile stock with a 1.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JAKK's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAKK currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs BBW's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.85 | $24.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.36 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 59.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 419K | 76K |
Analyst Outlook
JAKK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BBW as "Buy" and JAKK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 87.0% upside for BBW (target: $70) vs 79.0% for JAKK (target: $42). For income investors, JAKK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs BBW's 2.16%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $41.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +2.1% |
BBW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JAKK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BBW vs JAKK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBW or JAKK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBW or JAKK?
On trailing P/E, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus JAKKS Pacific, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBW or JAKK?
Over the past 5 years, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) delivered a total return of +430. 9%, compared to +161. 5% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBW returned +203. 8% versus JAKK's -66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBW or JAKK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 59β versus JAKKS Pacific, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning JAKK is approximately 12% more volatile than BBW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 70% for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBW or JAKK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. grew EPS 4. 1% year-over-year, compared to -72. 6% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BBW leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBW or JAKK?
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus 1. 7% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BBW leads at 13. 4% versus 2. 5% for JAKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBW leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBW or JAKK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBW: 87. 0% to $70. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBW or JAKK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 2% for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW).
09Is BBW or JAKK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
(BBW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 2% yield, +203. 8% 10Y return). JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBW: +203. 8%, JAKK: -66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBW and JAKK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBW is a small-cap deep-value stock; JAKK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.