BBWI vs IPAR

For growth investors, Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) offers the better valuation at 6. 3x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Bath & Body Works, Inc.

(BBWI) is the cheapest at 6. 3x versus Inter Parfums, Inc. at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, Bath & Body Works, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Inter Parfums, Inc. wins at 0. 57x versus Bath & Body Works, Inc. 's 14. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) delivered a total return of +41. 9%, compared to -57. 5% for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPAR returned +255. 2% versus BBWI's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Bath & Body Works, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning BBWI is approximately 193% more volatile than IPAR relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -0. 2% for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inter Parfums, Inc. grew EPS 2. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 0% for Bath & Body Works, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPAR leads at 11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 8. 9% for Bath & Body Works, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPAR leads at 18. 2% versus 15. 4% for BBWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPAR leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus Bath & Body Works, Inc. 's 14. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Inter Parfums, Inc. — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPAR: 14. 4% to $107. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 3. 4% for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Inter Parfums, Inc.

(IPAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 3. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPAR: +255. 2%, BBWI: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BBWI (Consumer Cyclical) and IPAR (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.