BC vs HZO

For growth investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger pick with 2.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). Analysts rate Brunswick Corporation (BC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.

5%, compared to -49. 9% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +96. 4% versus HZO's +78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

69β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning HZO is approximately 24% more volatile than BC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 149% for Brunswick Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brunswick Corporation (BC) is pulling ahead at 2.

4% versus -5. 0% for MarineMax, Inc. (HZO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MarineMax, Inc. grew EPS -186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -207. 8% for Brunswick Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HZO leads at 0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MarineMax, Inc.

(HZO) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 4% net margin versus -2. 6% for Brunswick Corporation — meaning it keeps -1. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HZO leads at 4. 5% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HZO leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Brunswick Corporation (BC) trades at 19.

0x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for MarineMax, Inc. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BC: 9. 9% to $88. 78.

In this comparison, BC (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. HZO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

1% yield). MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BC: +96. 4%, HZO: +78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

BC pays a dividend while HZO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.