Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BCAB vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BCAB vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5M | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -29.7% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.9x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $3M |
BCAB vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCAB vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCAB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.51
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.51, current ratio 0.37x
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- -94.3% 10Y total return vs BCAB's -99.7%
- 10.4% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% revenue growth vs BCAB's -81.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs BCAB's -29.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.1% vs BCAB's -80.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs BCAB's -250.6% |
BCAB vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCAB vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $114M annually — 57.1x BCAB's $2M. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCAB's -29.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$59M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -29.7% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.8% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BCAB and AGEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs BCAB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.0% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$918,000 | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGEN five years ago would be worth $611 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for BCAB. Over the past 12 months, AGEN leads with a +27.1% total return vs BCAB's -80.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGEN at -51.0% vs BCAB's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -83.7% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.6% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCAB and AGEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGEN currently trades 51.1% from its 52-week high vs BCAB's 6.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.50 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.1% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BCAB as "Buy" and AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5647.1% upside for BCAB (target: $250) vs 95.5% for AGEN (target: $7).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $250.00 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGEN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
BCAB vs AGEN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCAB or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -81. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Analysts rate BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCAB or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) delivered a total return of -93. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGEN returned -94. 2% versus BCAB's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCAB or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 672% more volatile than BCAB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BCAB or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -81. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. (BCAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 29. 9% for BioAtla, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCAB or AGEN?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -29. 8% for BioAtla, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGEN leads at -18. 0% versus -29. 7% for BCAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAB leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BCAB or AGEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCAB: 5647.
1% to $250. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BCAB or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BCAB or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioAtla, Inc.
(BCAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCAB: -99. 7%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BCAB and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.