Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BCDA
BioCardia, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
ANIK
Anika Therapeutics, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.-54.8%
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$548M
5Y Perf.+2.8%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-75.0%
SYK
Stryker Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$112.69B
5Y Perf.+50.3%

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BCDA logoBCDA
ANIK logoANIK
MDXG logoMDXG
NVCR logoNVCR
SYK logoSYK
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$5M$203M$548M$1.92B$112.69B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$116M$389M$674M$25.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$-11M$31M$-173M$3.25B
Gross Margin-74.6%58.6%81.0%75.2%63.5%
Operating Margin-137.9%-10.5%10.2%-27.2%22.4%
Forward P/E295.2x19.6x
Total Debt$951K$24M$23M$290M$14.86B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$57M$166M$103M$4.01B

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BCDA
ANIK
MDXG
NVCR
SYK
StockMay 20May 26Return
BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA)1000.6-99.4%
Anika Therapeutics,… (ANIK)10045.2-54.8%
MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)100102.8+2.8%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10025.0-75.0%
Stryker Corporation (SYK)100150.3+50.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SYK leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MiMedx Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ANIK also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BCDA
BioCardia, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

BCDA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ANIK
Anika Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ANIK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 4.72x
  • Beta 1.14, current ratio 4.72x
  • +4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MDXG
MiMedx Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

MDXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
  • 20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8%
  • 9.7% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9%
Best for: growth exposure
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
SYK
Stryker Corporation
The Income Pick

SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
  • 187.1% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 12.9% margin vs BCDA's -137.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMDXG logoMDXG20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8%
ValueSYK logoSYKBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSYK logoSYK12.9% margin vs BCDA's -137.0%
Stability / SafetySYK logoSYKBeta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsSYK logoSYK1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ANIK logoANIK+4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MDXG logoMDXG9.7% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9%

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BCDABioCardia, Inc.
FY 2023
Collaboration Agreement
100.0%$477,000
ANIKAnika Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Joint Preservation and Restoration
84.8%$55M
Non-Orthopedic
15.2%$10M
MDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Surgical
100.0%$142M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SYKStryker Corporation
FY 2025
MedSurg
62.3%$15.6B
Orthopaedics
37.7%$9.5B

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSYKLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SYK and BCDA operate at a comparable scale, with $25.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. SYK is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCDA's -137.0%. On growth, ANIK holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$116M$389M$674M$25.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M-$7M$53M-$165M$6.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M-$11M$31M-$173M$3.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$1M$66M-$48M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-74.6%+58.6%+81.0%+75.2%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-137.9%-10.5%+10.2%-27.2%+22.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-137.0%-9.5%+7.9%-25.7%+12.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-138.5%+0.9%+17.0%-7.1%+17.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%-33.1%+12.3%+11.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-386.3%-8.8%-2.4%-100.0%+56.0%
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 67% valuation discount to SYK's 35.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYK's 20.3x.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$5M$203M$548M$1.9B$112.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$170M$405M$2.1B$123.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.38x-19.92x11.53x-13.80x35.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.295.20x19.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.14x20.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue86.47x1.80x1.31x2.92x4.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.57x1.51x2.15x5.51x5.02x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.51x7.51x26.31x
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MDXG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BCDA. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCDA's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANIK scores 6/9 vs BCDA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.3%-7.7%+12.9%-50.8%+15.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-138.9%-5.9%+9.7%-16.5%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.1%+42.3%-16.4%+11.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.5%-6.4%+25.7%-28.9%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926556
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.14x0.17x0.09x0.85x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$33M-$144M$187M$10.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$57M$166M$103M$4.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$951,000$24M$23M$290M$14.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense25.32x-96.80x6.72x
MDXG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $12,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $70 for BCDA. Over the past 12 months, ANIK leads with a +4.5% total return vs BCDA's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 1.8% vs BCDA's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.2%+61.9%-43.1%+28.3%-15.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-58.9%+4.5%-47.1%+1.1%-22.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-41.7%-36.6%-75.7%+5.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-63.9%-62.9%-91.3%+21.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-65.9%-48.5%+30.3%+187.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-77.2%-16.5%-14.1%-37.6%+1.8%
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ANIK and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ANIK currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BCDA's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.14x1.22x2.20x0.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.92$16.24$7.99$20.06$404.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$7.87$3.02$9.82$289.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.3%+93.2%+46.2%+83.9%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.253.349.369.824.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K135K1.4M1.5M2.1M
Evenly matched — ANIK and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ANIK as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 37.2% for SYK (target: $404). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBCDA logoBCDABioCardia, Inc.ANIK logoANIKAnika Therapeutic…MDXG logoMDXGMiMedx Group, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedSYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$33.50$403.69
# AnalystsCovering analysts6151550
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises134
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.7%+0.6%0.0%0.0%
SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MDXG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallStryker Corporation (SYK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Stryker Corporation at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Stryker Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +21.

5%, compared to -99. 3% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +187. 1% versus BCDA's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

55β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 303% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 114% for BioCardia, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.

(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anika Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 80. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Stryker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDXG leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

9% net margin versus -137. 0% for BioCardia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -137. 9% for BCDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Stryker Corporation (SYK) trades at 19.

6x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 275. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?

In this comparison, SYK (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. BCDA, ANIK, MDXG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BCDA and ANIK and MDXG and NVCR and SYK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BCDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANIK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while BCDA, ANIK, MDXG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BCDA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANIK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SYK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BCDA and ANIK and MDXG and NVCR and SYK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BCDA: -87.8% · ANIK: 13.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.