Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $5M | $203M | $548M | $1.92B | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $116M | $389M | $674M | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-11M | $31M | $-173M | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | -74.6% | 58.6% | 81.0% | 75.2% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -137.9% | -10.5% | 10.2% | -27.2% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 295.2x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $951K | $24M | $23M | $290M | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $57M | $166M | $103M | $4.01B |
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Anika Therapeutics,… (ANIK) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCDA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ANIK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 4.72x
- Beta 1.14, current ratio 4.72x
- +4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9%
MDXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8%
- 9.7% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- 187.1% 10Y total return vs MDXG's -48.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 12.9% margin vs BCDA's -137.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.9% margin vs BCDA's -137.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.5% vs BCDA's -58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9% |
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories
MDXG leads 2 • BCDA leads 0 • ANIK leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK and BCDA operate at a comparable scale, with $25.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. SYK is the more profitable business, keeping 12.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCDA's -137.0%. On growth, ANIK holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $116M | $389M | $674M | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$7M | $53M | -$165M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$11M | $31M | -$173M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $1M | $66M | -$48M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -74.6% | +58.6% | +81.0% | +75.2% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -137.9% | -10.5% | +10.2% | -27.2% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.0% | -9.5% | +7.9% | -25.7% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -138.5% | +0.9% | +17.0% | -7.1% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.2% | -33.1% | +12.3% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -386.3% | -8.8% | -2.4% | -100.0% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MDXG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, MDXG trades at a 67% valuation discount to SYK's 35.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MDXG's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYK's 20.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $203M | $548M | $1.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $170M | $405M | $2.1B | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -19.92x | 11.53x | -13.80x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 295.20x | — | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.14x | — | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 86.47x | 1.80x | 1.31x | 2.92x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.57x | 1.51x | 2.15x | 5.51x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.51x | 7.51x | — | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDXG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BCDA. MDXG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCDA's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANIK scores 6/9 vs BCDA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -7.7% | +12.9% | -50.8% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.9% | -5.9% | +9.7% | -16.5% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -7.1% | +42.3% | -16.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.5% | -6.4% | +25.7% | -28.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 0.17x | 0.09x | 0.85x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$33M | -$144M | $187M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $57M | $166M | $103M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $951,000 | $24M | $23M | $290M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 25.32x | -96.80x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $12,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $70 for BCDA. Over the past 12 months, ANIK leads with a +4.5% total return vs BCDA's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 1.8% vs BCDA's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | +61.9% | -43.1% | +28.3% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.9% | +4.5% | -47.1% | +1.1% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -41.7% | -36.6% | -75.7% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -63.9% | -62.9% | -91.3% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -65.9% | -48.5% | +30.3% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.2% | -16.5% | -14.1% | -37.6% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANIK and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ANIK currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BCDA's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.14x | 1.22x | 2.20x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.92 | $16.24 | $7.99 | $20.06 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $7.87 | $3.02 | $9.82 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +93.2% | +46.2% | +83.9% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 53.3 | 49.3 | 69.8 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 135K | 1.4M | 1.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANIK as "Buy", MDXG as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 171.0% upside for MDXG (target: $10) vs 37.2% for SYK (target: $404). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | $33.50 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 15 | 15 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MDXG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BCDA vs ANIK vs MDXG vs NVCR vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (295. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (ANIK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
On trailing P/E, MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Stryker Corporation at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Stryker Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +21.
5%, compared to -99. 3% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +187. 1% versus BCDA's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 303% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 114% for BioCardia, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MiMedx Group, Inc.
(MDXG) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Anika Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 80. 2% year-over-year, compared to 8. 2% for Stryker Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDXG leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
9% net margin versus -137. 0% for BioCardia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -137. 9% for BCDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDXG leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Stryker Corporation (SYK) trades at 19.
6x forward P/E versus 295. 2x for MiMedx Group, Inc. — 275. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDXG: 171. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BCDA, ANIK, MDXG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BCDA or ANIK or MDXG or NVCR or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCDA and ANIK and MDXG and NVCR and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANIK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDXG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while BCDA, ANIK, MDXG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.