Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $5M | $1.92B | $280M | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $674M | $7M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-173M | $-136M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | -74.6% | 75.2% | — | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -137.9% | -27.2% | -22.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $951K | $290M | $78M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $103M | $47M | $2.22B |
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 7.4 | -92.6% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCDA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 8.3% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8%
FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 40.5% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- +143.0% vs BCDA's -58.9%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- 13.0% margin vs BCDA's -137.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs BCDA's -87.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs BCDA's -137.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.0% vs BCDA's -58.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs BCDA's -138.9% |
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 3 of 6 categories
NVCR leads 1 • BCDA leads 0 • FATE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT and BCDA operate at a comparable scale, with $35.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCDA's -137.0%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $674M | $7M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$165M | -$148M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$173M | -$136M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$48M | -$88M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -74.6% | +75.2% | — | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -137.9% | -27.2% | -22.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -137.0% | -25.7% | -20.5% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -138.5% | -7.1% | -13.2% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.3% | -26.4% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -386.3% | -100.0% | +38.6% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NVCR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $1.9B | $280M | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $2.1B | $312M | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.38x | -13.80x | -2.11x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 86.47x | 2.92x | 42.18x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.57x | 5.51x | 1.39x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BCDA. FATE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCDA's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDT scores 6/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -50.8% | -65.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.9% | -16.5% | -42.7% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.4% | -36.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.5% | -28.9% | -43.1% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 0.85x | 0.38x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $187M | $31M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $103M | $47M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $951,000 | $290M | $78M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -96.80x | — | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FATE and MDT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDT five years ago would be worth $7,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $70 for BCDA. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs BCDA's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MDT at -1.4% vs BCDA's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | +28.3% | +145.5% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.9% | +1.1% | +143.0% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -75.7% | -55.4% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -91.3% | -96.8% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +30.3% | +40.5% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.2% | -37.6% | -23.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FATE and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs BCDA's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 2.15x | 1.99x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.92 | $20.06 | $2.46 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $9.82 | $0.91 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +83.9% | +98.6% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 69.8 | 81.0 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 1.5M | 1.9M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 40.5% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $39.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 31 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BCDA vs NVCR vs FATE vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is the stronger pick with 8.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Medtronic plc (MDT) delivered a total return of -27.
7%, compared to -99. 3% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +38. 5% versus BCDA's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 114% for BioCardia, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is pulling ahead at 8.
3% versus -87. 8% for BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BioCardia, Inc. grew EPS 64. 6% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVCR leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT?
Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -137. 0% for BioCardia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -137. 9% for BCDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BCDA, NVCR, FATE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BCDA or NVCR or FATE or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 3. 6% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BCDA and NVCR and FATE and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while BCDA, NVCR, FATE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.