Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BCLI
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-99.4%
AGEN
Agenus Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$132M
5Y Perf.-95.0%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.-74.4%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$280M
5Y Perf.-92.5%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.98B
5Y Perf.+1.3%

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BCLI logoBCLI
AGEN logoAGEN
NKTR logoNKTR
FATE logoFATE
CRL logoCRL
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$7M$132M$1.69B$280M$8.98B
Revenue (TTM)$849K$114M$55M$7M$4.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$115K$-164M$-136M$-185M
Gross Margin61.5%35.7%99.6%24.9%
Operating Margin-14.0%-17.7%-237.9%-22.2%11.8%
Forward P/E0.3x1.8x16.4x
Total Debt$720K$10M$149M$78M$3.07B
Cash & Equiv.$187K$3M$15M$47M$214M

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BCLI
AGEN
NKTR
FATE
CRL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI)1000.6-99.4%
Agenus Inc. (AGEN)1005.0-95.0%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10025.6-74.4%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1007.5-92.5%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)100101.3+1.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BCLI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Agenus Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NKTR also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BCLI
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Leader

BCLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 147.5% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
  • Lower P/E (0.3x vs 16.4x)
  • Beta 1.12 vs AGEN's 2.72
Best for: growth and value
AGEN
Agenus Inc.
The Growth Play

AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
  • 0.1% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
  • 0.1% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +8.2% vs BCLI's -42.7%
Best for: momentum
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

FATE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Income Pick

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.52
  • 119.2% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 95.5%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 1.52, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCLI logoBCLI147.5% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
ValueBCLI logoBCLILower P/E (0.3x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsAGEN logoAGEN0.1% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Stability / SafetyBCLI logoBCLIBeta 1.12 vs AGEN's 2.72
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+8.2% vs BCLI's -42.7%
Efficiency (ROA)AGEN logoAGEN0.1% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1%

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BCLIBrainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGENAgenus Inc.
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue
99.1%$109M
Other
0.9%$1M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M
CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAGENLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRL is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 4743.3x BCLI's $849,000. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$849,000$114M$55M$7M$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M-$10M-$130M-$148M$757M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M$115,000-$164M-$136M-$185M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M-$159M-$209M-$88M$391M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.5%+35.7%+99.6%+24.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-14.0%-17.7%-2.4%-22.2%+11.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.5%+0.1%-3.0%-20.5%-4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.2%-139.1%-3.8%-13.2%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.5%-25.3%-26.4%+1.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.0%+85.3%-4.5%+38.6%-160.0%
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Market CapShares × price$7M$132M$1.7B$280M$9.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M$140M$1.8B$312M$11.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.32x-1102.94x-8.57x-2.11x-62.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.79x16.42x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.27x1.16x30.64x42.18x2.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share15.66x1.39x2.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.31x
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CRL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CRL delivers a -5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. FATE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.0%-65.8%-5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.5%+0.1%-62.8%-42.7%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.2%-36.5%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-55.7%-43.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946224
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.66x0.38x0.95x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$533,000$7M$134M$31M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$187,000$3M$15M$47M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$720,000$10M$149M$78M$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-26.44x1.11x-4.74x6.38x
CRL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRL five years ago would be worth $5,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs BCLI's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.7%+16.1%+92.0%+145.5%-10.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-42.7%+27.1%+818.2%+143.0%+32.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%-88.2%+621.8%-55.4%-4.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%-93.9%-72.3%-96.8%-46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%-94.3%-59.1%+40.5%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-74.9%-51.0%+93.3%-23.6%-1.4%
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BCLI and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BCLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x2.72x1.85x2.17x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.92$7.34$109.00$2.46$228.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.46$2.71$7.99$0.91$131.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+36.1%+51.1%+76.5%+98.6%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.348.853.481.057.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K814K991K1.9M806K
Evenly matched — BCLI and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AGEN as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).

MetricBCLI logoBCLIBrainstorm Cell T…AGEN logoAGENAgenus Inc.NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.33$132.83$39.50$205.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts11333136
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%+4.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CRL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallAgenus Inc. (AGEN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BCLI vs AGEN vs NKTR vs FATE vs CRL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.

is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

Over the past 5 years, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

(CRL) delivered a total return of -46. 9%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRL returned +119. 2% versus BCLI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

(BCLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 142% more volatile than BCLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRL leads at 12. 6% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCLI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.

(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525. 5% to $39. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BCLI or AGEN or NKTR or FATE or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.

(BCLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCLI: -97. 8%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BCLI and AGEN and NKTR and FATE and CRL?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BCLI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGEN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NKTR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.