Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $279M | $5.29B | $3.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $849K | $75M | $4M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-35M | $-569M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 87.6% | -41.7% | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -14.0% | -35.1% | -134.1% | -281.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $720K | $91M | $395M | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187K | $143M | $355M | $295M |
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCLI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.05
- Beta 1.05 vs BEAM's 2.08
CLLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 54.0%, EPS growth 76.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 54.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
- -47.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- +151.6% vs BCLI's -42.9%
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 289.1% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 72.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
- Beta 1.87, current ratio 13.32x
BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -4.6% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -47.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs BEAM's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +151.6% vs BCLI's -42.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1% |
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCLI leads 0 • CRSP leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $132M annually — 155.8x BCLI's $849,000. CLLS is the more profitable business, keeping -47.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CLLS holds the edge at +117.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $849,000 | $75M | $4M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$6M | -$535M | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$35M | -$569M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$33M | -$401M | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.5% | +87.6% | -41.7% | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -35.1% | -134.1% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -47.0% | -138.6% | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -43.5% | -97.8% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +117.1% | +68.6% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.0% | +102.6% | +19.0% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLLS and CRSP and BEAM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $279M | $5.3B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $228M | $5.3B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -9.39x | -8.47x | -39.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.31x | 6.73x | 1506.63x | 23.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.66x | 2.57x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.31x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRSP and BEAM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-32 for CLLS. CRSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLLS's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLLS scores 7/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -31.8% | -30.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -9.8% | -24.5% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -79.6% | -22.3% | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -30.0% | -26.6% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.70x | 0.21x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $533,000 | -$52M | $40M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187,000 | $143M | $355M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $720,000 | $91M | $395M | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.44x | -3.44x | — | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth $5,404 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $154 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, CLLS leads with a +151.6% total return vs BCLI's -42.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLLS at 26.5% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | -19.8% | +2.0% | +19.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.9% | +151.6% | +51.7% | +87.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +102.6% | -2.0% | -3.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -74.3% | -46.0% | -49.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -88.5% | +289.1% | +72.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.9% | +26.5% | -0.7% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCLI and BEAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEAM currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.73x | 1.87x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $5.48 | $78.48 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $1.33 | $34.12 | $15.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.3% | +70.3% | +69.9% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 50.7 | 49.4 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 42K | 1.9M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLLS as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for CLLS (target: $6) vs 14.9% for CRSP (target: $63).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $63.00 | $40.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 38 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLLS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cellectis S.
A. (CLLS) is the stronger pick with 54. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellectis S. A. (CLLS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) delivered a total return of -46.
0%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +289. 1% versus BCLI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning BEAM is approximately 99% more volatile than BCLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 70% for Cellectis S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cellectis S.
A. (CLLS) is pulling ahead at 54. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLLS leads at -143. 5% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCLI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCLI: -97. 8%, BEAM: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BCLI and CLLS and CRSP and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.