Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $58M | $27M | $41M | $737M | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $162M | $13M | $1.27B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-14M | $3M | $18M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 6.9% | 53.4% | 35.1% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | -0.5% | 28.3% | 2.3% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | — | 15.3x | 60.7x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $47M | $86M | $576K | $740M | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $11M | $3M | $21M | $135M |
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flanigan's Enterpri… (BDL) | 100 | 107.3 | +7.3% |
| Ark Restaurants Cor… (ARKR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.8% |
| RAVE Restaurant Gro… (RAVE) | 100 | 236.6 | +136.6% |
| First Watch Restaur… (FWRG) | 100 | 55.4 | -44.6% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 177.8 | +77.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 59.6%, current ratio 1.69x
- PEG 0.33 vs TXRH's 1.17
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.69x
ARKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RAVE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 23.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5%
- 16.8% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 21.6% vs -2.6%
FWRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7%
TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs BDL's 90.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs ARKR's -9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.33 vs 1.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs ARKR's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs FWRG's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs ARKR's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.8% ROA vs ARKR's -10.5%, ROIC 21.6% vs -2.6% |
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
BDL leads 1 • ARKR leads 0 • FWRG leads 0 • TXRH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 480.0x RAVE's $13M. RAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARKR's -8.5%. On growth, FWRG holds the edge at +17.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $162M | $13M | $1.3B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $2M | $4M | $109M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$14M | $3M | $18M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$1M | $3M | -$9M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +6.9% | +53.4% | +35.1% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -0.5% | +28.3% | +2.3% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -8.5% | +23.2% | +1.4% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | -0.9% | +25.3% | -0.7% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | -9.4% | +8.7% | +17.3% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | -71.6% | +20.7% | -2.2% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BDL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BDL trades at a 70% valuation discount to FWRG's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BDL offers better value at 0.33x vs TXRH's 0.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $58M | $27M | $41M | $737M | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $85M | $101M | $39M | $1.5B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.58x | -2.33x | 15.32x | 38.55x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 60.72x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.33x | — | — | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.52x | — | 10.28x | 13.38x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.16x | 3.44x | 0.60x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 0.83x | 2.99x | 1.20x | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | — | 12.39x | — | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAVE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-42 for ARKR. RAVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARKR's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDL scores 8/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | -41.5% | +19.2% | +2.9% | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | -10.5% | +16.8% | +1.0% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | -2.6% | +21.6% | +1.9% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | -3.4% | +22.8% | +2.3% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 2.67x | 0.04x | 1.18x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | $74M | -$2M | $718M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $11M | $3M | $21M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47M | $86M | $576,000 | $740M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.00x | -21.75x | 9.23x | 1.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RAVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAVE five years ago would be worth $22,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,406 for ARKR. Over the past 12 months, BDL leads with a +34.7% total return vs ARKR's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RAVE at 24.7% vs ARKR's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +12.0% | -8.8% | -22.3% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | -37.3% | +16.9% | -25.3% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -52.4% | +94.0% | -28.9% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -55.9% | +120.5% | -46.0% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.3% | -36.1% | -42.0% | -46.0% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | -21.9% | +24.7% | -10.7% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BDL and ARKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARKR is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRG's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BDL currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs ARKR's 58.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | -0.42x | 0.60x | 1.59x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.98 | $12.60 | $3.75 | $19.53 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.61 | $5.98 | $2.25 | $10.10 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +58.7% | +77.6% | +61.2% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 53.4 | 51.5 | 46.5 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 5K | 55K | 1.6M | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BDL and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWRG as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 59.0% upside for FWRG (target: $19) vs 21.3% for TXRH (target: $192). For income investors, BDL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $19.00 | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 15 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | — | — | — | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
RAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BDL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BDL vs ARKR vs RAVE vs FWRG vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (BDL) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
(BDL) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -55. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus FWRG's -46. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning FWRG is approximately -477% more volatile than ARKR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.
(FWRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -9. 7% for Ark Restaurants Corp. (ARKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS 49. 7% year-over-year, compared to -194. 4% for Ark Restaurants Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRG leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.
(RAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus -6. 9% for Ark Restaurants Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAVE leads at 27. 1% versus -2. 5% for ARKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAVE leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 60. 7x for First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. — 35. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRG: 59. 0% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH?
In this comparison, BDL (1.
8% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. ARKR, RAVE, FWRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BDL or ARKR or RAVE or FWRG or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ark Restaurants Corp.
(ARKR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. (FWRG) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARKR: -36. 1%, FWRG: -46. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BDL and ARKR and RAVE and FWRG and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDL is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARKR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RAVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FWRG is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BDL, TXRH pay a dividend while ARKR, RAVE, FWRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.