Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $68M | $161.07B | $112.69B | $1.92B | $16.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $10.58B | $25.12B | $674M | $8.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $2.98B | $3.25B | $-173M | $761M |
| Gross Margin | 88.2% | 66.3% | 63.5% | 75.2% | 70.0% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 30.5% | 22.4% | -27.2% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3.8x | 43.3x | 19.1x | — | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $303M | $14.86B | $290M | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $3.37B | $4.01B | $103M | $592M |
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baird Medical Inves… (BDMD) | 100 | 17.7 | -82.3% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 125.3 | +25.3% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 106.7 | +6.7% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 23.8 | -76.2% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 33.6% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
- 18.5% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 22.6% vs -16.4%
ISRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SYK's 187.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- 20.5% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2%
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- PEG 1.28 vs ISRG's 1.99
- Beta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
- 1.1% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs BDMD's -65.2%
ZBH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.65, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.98x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.6% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs ZBH's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs BDMD's -65.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 22.6% vs -16.4% |
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BDMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
ISRG leads 1 • SYK leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • ZBH leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 678.1x BDMD's $37M. BDMD is the more profitable business, keeping 33.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $10.6B | $25.1B | $674M | $8.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $3.8B | $6.3B | -$165M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $3.0B | $3.2B | -$173M | $761M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $2.8B | $4.3B | -$48M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.2% | +66.3% | +63.5% | +75.2% | +70.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +30.5% | +22.4% | -27.2% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +28.2% | +12.9% | -25.7% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.8% | +26.8% | +17.1% | -7.1% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +23.0% | +11.4% | +12.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.8% | +56.0% | -100.0% | +34.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BDMD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.8x trailing earnings, BDMD trades at a 93% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $161.1B | $112.7B | $1.9B | $16.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $158.0B | $123.5B | $2.1B | $23.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.80x | 57.62x | 35.03x | -13.80x | 23.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.35x | 19.06x | — | 9.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.65x | 2.36x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.13x | 43.62x | 20.31x | — | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 16.00x | 4.49x | 2.92x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 9.17x | 5.02x | 5.51x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 64.67x | 26.31x | — | 11.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BDMD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDMD delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs BDMD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.0% | +16.9% | +15.0% | -50.8% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | +14.8% | +6.9% | -16.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.6% | +15.0% | +11.4% | -16.4% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +37.8% | +16.5% | +13.0% | -28.9% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.02x | 0.66x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$3.1B | $10.8B | $187M | $6.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $103M | $592M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $303M | $14.9B | $290M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.55x | — | 6.72x | -96.80x | 4.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs BDMD's -65.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISRG at 14.4% vs BDMD's -43.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.8% | -19.3% | -15.2% | +28.3% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -65.2% | -15.4% | -22.5% | +1.1% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +49.6% | +5.5% | -75.7% | -37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +58.7% | +21.5% | -91.3% | -47.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +554.2% | +187.1% | +30.3% | -17.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.4% | +14.4% | +1.8% | -37.6% | -14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SYK and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BDMD's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.00x | 0.52x | 2.15x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.26 | $603.88 | $404.87 | $20.06 | $108.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.76 | $427.84 | $289.91 | $9.82 | $79.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.6% | +75.1% | +72.7% | +83.9% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 42.4 | 24.3 | 69.8 | 34.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 960K | 1.8M | 2.1M | 1.5M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SYK and ZBH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ISRG as "Buy", SYK as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 17.4% for ZBH (target: $98). For income investors, ZBH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.15% vs SYK's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $622.60 | $389.62 | $33.50 | $97.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 50 | 15 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 34 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.36 | — | $0.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
BDMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ISRG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BDMD vs ISRG vs SYK vs NVCR vs ZBH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited (BDMD) offers the better valuation at 3. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
On trailing P/E, Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited (BDMD) is the cheapest at 3.
8x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 28x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus BDMD's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 310% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -19. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited (BDMD) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
6% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDMD leads at 41. 4% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BDMD leads at 88. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 33. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH?
In this comparison, ZBH (1.
1% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BDMD, ISRG, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BDMD or ISRG or SYK or NVCR or ZBH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 1. 1% yield, +179. 2% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +179. 2%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BDMD and ISRG and SYK and NVCR and ZBH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, ZBH pay a dividend while BDMD, ISRG, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.