Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $960K | $30.33B | $8.76B | $9.51B | $12.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $16.63B | $4.03B | $8.10B | $2.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $1.39B | $-185M | $599M | $460M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% | 31.9% | 26.9% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.9% | 11.8% | 12.2% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.0x | 16.0x | 10.7x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $61K | $16.17B | $3.07B | $3.60B | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1.98B | $214M | $539M | $497M |
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biodexa Pharmaceuti… (BDRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 456.8 | +356.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.31, current ratio 2.03x
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- PEG 0.34 vs ICLR's 1.53
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ICLR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 25.0x)
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.6%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs BDRX's -100.0%
- 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs BDRX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs ICLR's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.0% vs BDRX's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs BDRX's -78.4%, ROIC 154.9% vs -120.3% |
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • BDRX leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and BDRX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $16.6B | $4.0B | $8.1B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $3.5B | $824M | $1.4B | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $1.4B | -$185M | $599M | $460M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $2.7B | $391M | $996M | $745M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.1% | +31.9% | +26.9% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +11.8% | +12.2% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | -4.6% | +7.4% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.1% | +9.7% | +12.3% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.4% | +1.2% | +0.6% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +15.0% | -160.0% | -98.7% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, ICLR trades at a 53% valuation discount to MEDP's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs ICLR's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $959,722 | $30.3B | $8.8B | $9.5B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$11M | $44.5B | $11.6B | $12.6B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 22.79x | -61.04x | 13.06x | 27.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.96x | 16.00x | 10.73x | 24.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.56x | — | 1.86x | 0.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.98x | 12.75x | 7.92x | 21.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.86x | 2.18x | 1.15x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 4.68x | 2.74x | 1.09x | 27.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.79x | 16.90x | 8.50x | 17.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-121 for BDRX. BDRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -121.4% | +22.1% | -5.7% | +6.3% | +120.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.4% | +4.7% | -2.5% | +3.6% | +24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -120.3% | +8.7% | +6.3% | +6.5% | +154.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -75.9% | +11.0% | +8.1% | +7.8% | +65.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.44x | 0.95x | 0.38x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $14.2B | $2.9B | $3.1B | -$247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $2.0B | $214M | $539M | $497M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60,892 | $16.2B | $3.1B | $3.6B | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -82.66x | 3.10x | 4.29x | 3.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,697 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BDRX. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +41.0% total return vs BDRX's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 26.5% vs BDRX's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.4% | -20.7% | -12.3% | -34.0% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.0% | +16.6% | +25.7% | -10.1% | +41.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -5.9% | -6.5% | -34.4% | +102.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -22.8% | -46.6% | -44.8% | +167.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +166.6% | +114.0% | +90.2% | +1425.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.2% | -2.0% | -2.2% | -13.1% | +26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRL and MEDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MEDP is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs BDRX's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.32x | 1.44x | 1.64x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.50 | $247.05 | $228.88 | $211.00 | $628.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $134.65 | $132.58 | $66.57 | $284.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.4% | +72.3% | +77.6% | +59.0% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 60.3 | 57.4 | 62.8 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 1.5M | 792K | 1.1M | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.2% upside for IQV (target: $224) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $223.75 | $206.43 | $152.13 | $498.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 36 | 30 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +7.6% |
MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BDRX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
On trailing P/E, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Medpace Holdings, Inc. at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +167. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Biodexa Pharmaceuticals Plc (BDRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1426% versus BDRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 64β — meaning ICLR is approximately 35% more volatile than MEDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Biodexa Pharmaceuticals Plc (BDRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Biodexa Pharmaceuticals Plc grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 0% for BDRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 25. 2% to $223. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BDRX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +1426% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1426%, ICLR: +90. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BDRX and IQV and CRL and ICLR and MEDP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.