Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $960K | $344M | $135M | $1.09B | $1.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $94M | $114M | $361M | $56M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-4.04T | $115K | $-24M | $-158M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.8% | 35.7% | 79.3% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.7% | -17.7% | 4.1% | -226.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.8x | 2.9x | 176.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $61K | $595K | $10M | $473M | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $155M | $3M | $75M | $15M |
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biodexa Pharmaceuti… (BDRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 80.1 | -19.9% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 233.1 | +133.1% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.2 | -74.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 0.1% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
SIGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 12.5%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs MNKD's -46.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 11.83x
- Beta 1.09, yield 12.5%, current ratio 11.83x
AGEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 0.1% ROA vs BDRX's -78.4%
MNKD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 22.2% revenue growth vs BDRX's -100.0%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.8% vs BDRX's -94.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs BDRX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs AGEN's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 12.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs BDRX's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs BDRX's -78.4% |
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • BDRX leads 0 • AGEN leads 0 • MNKD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SIGA and AGEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNKD and BDRX operate at a comparable scale, with $361M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $94M | $114M | $361M | $56M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $26M | -$10M | $25M | -$125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$4.04T | $115,000 | -$24M | -$158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $27M | -$159M | $13M | -$160M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +61.8% | +35.7% | +79.3% | +80.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% | -17.7% | +4.1% | -2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -43117.4% | +0.1% | -6.6% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +29.2% | -139.1% | +3.5% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.3% | +27.5% | +15.1% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | — | +85.3% | -2.2% | +49.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SIGA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SIGA trades at a 92% valuation discount to MNKD's 176.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIGA's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $959,722 | $344M | $135M | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$11M | $190M | $142M | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.05x | 14.55x | -1123.53x | 176.00x | -8.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.82x | 2.94x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.81x | — | 29.09x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.64x | 1.18x | 3.12x | 30.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 1.73x | — | — | 15.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.98x | — | 79.44x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA delivers a -10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-121 for BDRX. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -121.4% | -10.7% | — | — | -87.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -78.4% | -7.4% | +0.1% | -3.9% | -40.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -120.3% | +33.7% | — | +21.6% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -75.9% | +11.3% | — | +8.3% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | — | — | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$154M | $7M | $399M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $155M | $3M | $75M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60,892 | $595,169 | $10M | $473M | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -82.66x | — | 1.11x | 0.75x | -6.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIGA five years ago would be worth $10,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BDRX. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs BDRX's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs BDRX's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.4% | -13.9% | +18.3% | -37.1% | +88.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.0% | -0.7% | +25.7% | -24.0% | +782.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +23.5% | -88.0% | -9.3% | +609.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +7.9% | -93.7% | -13.5% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +772.1% | -94.2% | -46.7% | -59.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.2% | +7.3% | -50.7% | -3.2% | +92.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIGA and NKTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIGA is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NKTR currently trades 75.1% from its 52-week high vs BDRX's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 1.09x | 2.58x | 1.09x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.50 | $9.62 | $7.34 | $6.51 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.10 | $4.29 | $2.71 | $2.23 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.4% | +49.9% | +52.0% | +54.1% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 48.5 | 46.1 | 73.8 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 923K | 703K | 822K | 6.0M | 977K |
Analyst Outlook
SIGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGA as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", MNKD as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.4% upside for MNKD (target: $8) vs 79.9% for NKTR (target: $147). SIGA is the only dividend payer here at 12.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $7.33 | $8.25 | $147.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 11 | 19 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +12.5% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SIGA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BDRX vs SIGA vs AGEN vs MNKD vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
On trailing P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus MannKind Corporation at 176. 0x. On forward P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) delivered a total return of +7. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Biodexa Pharmaceuticals Plc (BDRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +772. 1% versus BDRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 137% more volatile than SIGA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.
2% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Biodexa Pharmaceuticals Plc grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIGA leads at 25. 1% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) trades at 2. 8x forward P/E versus 2. 9x for Agenus Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 134. 4% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BDRX, AGEN, MNKD, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BDRX or SIGA or AGEN or MNKD or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 12. 5% yield, +772. 1% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +772. 1%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BDRX and SIGA and AGEN and MNKD and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SIGA pays a dividend while BDRX, AGEN, MNKD, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.