Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $35M | $4.10B | $1.92B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $788M | $674M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-28M | $-173M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.0% | 75.2% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.3% | -27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $731M | $290M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $236M | $103M | $2.22B |
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartBeam, Inc. (BEAT) | 100 | 24.4 | -75.6% |
| iRhythm Technologie… (IRTC) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 18.0 | -82.0% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IRTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 61.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.1%
- 379.3% 10Y total return vs MDT's 26.5%
- Beta 0.93, current ratio 4.63x
- 26.2% revenue growth vs BEAT's -100.0%
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs BEAT's -53.7%
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.85x
- Better valuation composite
- 13.0% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs BEAT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs BEAT's -53.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs BEAT's -353.1% |
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 3 of 6 categories
IRTC leads 1 • BEAT leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT and BEAT operate at a comparable scale, with $35.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, IRTC holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $788M | $674M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | -$6M | -$165M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$28M | -$173M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $19M | -$48M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.0% | +75.2% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.3% | -27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -3.5% | -25.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.4% | -7.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.7% | +12.3% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.2% | +55.7% | -100.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $4.1B | $1.9B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $4.6B | $2.1B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.40x | -89.83x | -13.80x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.49x | 2.92x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.27x | 26.16x | 5.51x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 118.84x | — | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-6 for BEAT. MDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRTC's 4.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRTC scores 6/9 vs BEAT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.7% | -20.6% | -50.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | -2.8% | -16.5% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | -4.4% | -28.9% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.79x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $495M | $187M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $236M | $103M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $731M | $290M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.48x | -96.80x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRTC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRTC five years ago would be worth $15,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs BEAT's -53.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRTC at -0.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -64.2% | -28.7% | +28.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.7% | -8.3% | +1.1% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.1% | -2.1% | -75.7% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | +56.1% | -91.3% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | +379.3% | +30.3% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.8% | -0.7% | -37.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BEAT's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.93x | 2.20x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $212.00 | $20.06 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.54 | $112.31 | $9.82 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.8% | +58.9% | +83.9% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 44.1 | 69.8 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 524K | 1.5M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRTC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 40.5% for MDT (target: $110). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $193.67 | $33.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IRTC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BEAT vs IRTC vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
(IRTC) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (IRTC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
(IRTC) delivered a total return of +56. 1%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRTC returned +379. 3% versus BEAT's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 373% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medtronic plc (MDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 5% for iRhythm Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
(IRTC) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iRhythm Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 61. 7% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for HeartBeam, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRTC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT?
Medtronic plc (MDT) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BEAT, IRTC, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BEAT or IRTC or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 3. 6% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +26. 5%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BEAT and IRTC and NVCR and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BEAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRTC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while BEAT, IRTC, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.