Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.67B | $4.37B | $11.79B | $167.94B | $4.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $702M | $2.79B | $453M | $25.90B | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $237M | $119M | $4.48B | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 35.8% | 57.3% | 37.3% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 12.3% | 18.1% | 26.0% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 37.3x | 14.2x | 94.3x | 29.3x | 55.5x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $1.47B | $13M | $15.50B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $390M | $403M | $11.13B | $59M |
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) | 100 | 3099.9 | +2999.9% |
| Belden Inc. (BDC) | 100 | 329.6 | +229.6% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Amphenol Corporation (APH) | 100 | 565.9 | +465.9% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BELFB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 16.3% 10Y total return vs VICR's 27.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.88, Low D/E 45.7%, current ratio 3.02x
BDC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.38 vs VICR's 2.10
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 55.5x)
- Beta 1.41 vs VICR's 2.79
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 26.2% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
- +5.4% vs BDC's +7.0%
- 16.6% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs 2.4%
APH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.7%, EPS growth 74.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 51.7% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.7% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs POWI's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.41 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs APH's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs BDC's +7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs 2.4% |
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 1 of 6 categories
BDC leads 1 • APH leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • BELFB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APH is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.9B annually — 58.0x POWI's $446M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, APH holds the edge at +58.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $702M | $2.8B | $453M | $25.9B | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $475M | $103M | $7.9B | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $237M | $119M | $4.5B | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $74M | $180M | $119M | $4.6B | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +35.8% | +57.3% | +37.3% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +12.3% | +18.1% | +26.0% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +8.5% | +26.2% | +17.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +6.5% | +26.3% | +17.9% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +11.4% | +11.5% | +58.4% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.0% | +2.4% | +3.4% | +24.1% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BDC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, BDC trades at a 90% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BDC offers better value at 0.51x vs VICR's 2.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $4.4B | $11.8B | $167.9B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $5.5B | $11.4B | $172.3B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.60x | 18.98x | 100.13x | 40.90x | 184.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.33x | 14.16x | 94.31x | 29.29x | 55.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.63x | 0.51x | 2.23x | 1.47x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.67x | 11.82x | 197.81x | 24.99x | 79.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.44x | 1.61x | 28.91x | 7.27x | 9.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.02x | 3.57x | 16.50x | 12.92x | 6.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 54.05x | 19.97x | 98.86x | 38.36x | 45.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APH delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDC's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BELFB scores 9/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | +18.8% | +18.7% | +34.6% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +6.8% | +16.6% | +13.6% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +11.0% | +8.9% | +28.3% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +12.0% | +5.7% | +25.5% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.17x | 0.02x | 1.15x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | $1.1B | -$390M | $4.4B | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $390M | $403M | $11.1B | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $1.5B | $13M | $15.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.38x | 6.89x | — | 13.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BELFB and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BELFB five years ago would be worth $167,159 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs BDC's +7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BELFB at 89.2% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.2% | -4.7% | +123.6% | -2.0% | +93.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +314.0% | +7.0% | +535.7% | +70.0% | +44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +577.4% | +40.3% | +507.9% | +267.6% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1571.6% | +109.7% | +201.3% | +308.8% | -8.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1633.2% | +91.1% | +2704.1% | +899.3% | +232.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.2% | +11.9% | +82.5% | +54.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BELFB and BDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BDC is the less volatile stock with a 1.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BELFB currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs BDC's 70.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.41x | 2.79x | 1.62x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $307.00 | $159.99 | $293.95 | $167.04 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.05 | $103.57 | $40.27 | $79.27 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +70.1% | +88.9% | +81.8% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 38.3 | 68.2 | 45.1 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 379K | 864K | 8.3M | 967K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BELFB as "Buy", BDC as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", APH as "Buy", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.7% upside for BDC (target: $150) vs -6.3% for VICR (target: $245). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs BDC's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $281.00 | $150.00 | $245.00 | $180.33 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 7 | 29 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.2% | — | +0.5% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $0.20 | — | $0.63 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +2.5% |
VICR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BELFB vs BDC vs VICR vs APH vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) is the stronger pick with 51.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Belden Inc. (BDC) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
On trailing P/E, Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Belden Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Belden Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) delivered a total return of +1572%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus BDC's +91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belden Inc.
(BDC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 41β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 98% more volatile than BDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 117% for Belden Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amphenol Corporation (APH) is pulling ahead at 51.
7% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APH leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus 5. 0% for Power Integrations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APH leads at 25. 9% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Belden Inc. (BDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Belden Inc. (BDC) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 80. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BDC: 33. 7% to $150. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), APH (0. 5% yield), BDC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BELFB, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BELFB or BDC or VICR or APH or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1633% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BELFB: +1633%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BELFB and BDC and VICR and APH and POWI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BELFB is a small-cap high-growth stock; BDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while BELFB, BDC, VICR, APH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.