Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $7M | $894M | $1.46B | $992M | $21.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117K | $2M | $66M | $255M | $4.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-118M | $-560M | $-103M | $853M |
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | -13.4% | -34.4% | 55.3% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -58.8% | -60.3% | -8.8% | -64.7% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5M | $78M | $109M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.18T | $20M | $743M | $231M | $1.42B |
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bullfrog AI Holding… (BFRG) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Absci Corporation (ABSI) | 100 | 271.2 | +171.2% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| Schrödinger, Inc. (SDGR) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFRG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ABSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 6.57x
- Beta 2.82, current ratio 6.57x
- +116.2% vs BFRG's -62.0%
RXRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 26.9% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2%
Among these 5 stocks, SDGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.23
- 0.7% 10Y total return vs SDGR's -53.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 19.4% margin vs ABSI's -73.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.9% revenue growth vs ABSI's -38.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs ABSI's -73.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs RXRX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.2% vs BFRG's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs BFRG's -177.1% |
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BFRG leads 1 • ABSI leads 1 • RXRX leads 0 • SDGR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 37636.1x BFRG's $116,670. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABSI's -73.1%. On growth, ILMN holds the edge at +4.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $116,670 | $2M | $66M | $255M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$116M | -$521M | -$159M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$118M | -$560M | -$103M | $853M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$99M | -$326M | -$148M | $989M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | -13.4% | -34.4% | +55.3% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.8% | -60.3% | -8.8% | -64.7% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | -73.1% | -8.4% | -40.6% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.1% | -60.8% | -4.9% | -58.2% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | -56.1% | -1.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.8% | +9.5% | +56.0% | +1.2% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BFRG leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $894M | $1.5B | $992M | $21.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2.18T | $879M | $797M | $871M | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.03x | -6.85x | -2.27x | -9.42x | 25.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 26.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 19.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 319.22x | 19.58x | 3.88x | 4.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 4.15x | 1.29x | 2.68x | 7.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 79.66x | 22.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-2 for BFRG. ABSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs BFRG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -63.6% | -54.3% | -30.8% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -177.1% | -54.7% | -40.6% | -15.3% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -58.0% | -95.8% | -39.4% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | -65.9% | -50.1% | -28.6% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.07x | 0.30x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.18T | -$15M | -$665M | -$121M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.18T | $20M | $743M | $231M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5M | $78M | $109M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -958.75x | -865.97x | -336.46x | — | 12.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,000 for BFRG. Over the past 12 months, ABSI leads with a +116.2% total return vs BFRG's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABSI at 59.4% vs BFRG's -42.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.2% | +59.3% | -22.1% | -26.1% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.0% | +116.2% | -22.0% | -44.0% | +81.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +304.9% | -41.6% | -52.1% | -27.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | -73.4% | -88.2% | -80.6% | -62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | -73.4% | -81.8% | -53.6% | +0.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.6% | +59.4% | -16.4% | -21.8% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABSI and ILMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABSI currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BFRG's 31.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.07x | 2.82x | 3.18x | 1.72x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.04 | $6.24 | $7.18 | $27.63 | $155.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $2.24 | $2.80 | $10.95 | $73.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.8% | +92.2% | +45.5% | +48.1% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 83.6 | 49.5 | 59.8 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.6M | 4.4M | 12.5M | 1.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABSI as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", SDGR as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.4% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs 6.3% for ILMN (target: $147).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.16 | $11.00 | $18.00 | $147.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 10 | 12 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFRG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BFRG vs ABSI vs RXRX vs SDGR vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Absci Corporation (ABSI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN?
Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -90. 0% for Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BFRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ILMN returned +0. 7% versus BFRG's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 157% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Absci Corporation (ABSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RXRX) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -38. 2% for Absci Corporation (ABSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to 10. 6% for Absci Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFRG leads at 225. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -55. 7% for Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -56. 5% for BFRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ILMN leads at 66. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RXRX: 236.
4% to $11. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BFRG or ABSI or RXRX or SDGR or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BFRG) carries a higher beta of 3. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ILMN: +0. 7%, BFRG: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BFRG and ABSI and RXRX and SDGR and ILMN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BFRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SDGR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.