Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1712.35T | $5.53B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $117K | $0.00 | $0.00 | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-168M | $-464M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | — | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -58.8% | — | — | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $22M | $98K | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.18T | $194M | $714M | $1.98B |
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bullfrog AI Holding… (BFRG) | 100 | 13.9 | -86.1% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 165.7 | +65.7% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 85.7 | -14.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BFRG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
- Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.67x
- Beta 1.26 vs BFRG's 3.07
- +110.4% vs BFRG's -62.0%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 8.3% margin vs BFRG's -57.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs BFRG's -57.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs BFRG's 3.07 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs BFRG's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs BFRG's -177.1% |
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
BFRG leads 1 • IMVT leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFRG's -57.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $116,670 | $0 | $0 | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$112M | -$487M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$168M | -$464M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$151M | -$423M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | — | — | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.8% | — | — | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | — | — | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -48.1% | — | — | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.8% | +91.5% | +19.7% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BFRG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1712.35T | $5.5B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2.18T | $1712.35T | $4.8B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.03x | -0.76x | -9.97x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | — | — | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.66x | 5.83x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for BFRG. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -130.2% | -47.1% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -177.1% | -89.0% | -44.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | — | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | -145.7% | -66.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.00x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.18T | -$172M | -$714M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.18T | $194M | $714M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $22M | $98,000 | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -958.75x | -189.82x | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,000 for BFRG. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs BFRG's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs BFRG's -42.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.2% | +4.9% | +5.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.0% | +110.4% | +96.1% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +19.7% | +40.9% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | -69.1% | +62.4% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | -87.0% | +173.6% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.6% | +6.2% | +12.1% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DBVT and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DBVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFRG's 3.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs BFRG's 31.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.05x | 1.26x | 1.36x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.04 | $26.18 | $30.09 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $7.53 | $13.36 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.8% | +76.3% | +90.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.6M | 252K | 1.4M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 25.3% for IQV (target: $224).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $45.50 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BFRG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BFRG vs DBVT vs IMVT vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV a better buy right now?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -90. 0% for Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BFRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus BFRG's -89. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DBV Technologies S.
A. (DBVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock's 3. 05β — meaning BFRG is approximately 142% more volatile than DBVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock grew EPS 25. 9% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFRG leads at 225. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -55. 7% for Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -56. 5% for BFRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IQV leads at 26. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BFRG or DBVT or IMVT or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+166. 6% 10Y return). Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (BFRG) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +166. 6%, BFRG: -89. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BFRG and DBVT and IMVT and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.