BG
Bunge Global S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.46B
5Y Perf.+223.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BG vs MOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MOS
The Mosaic Company
Agricultural Inputs
Market Cap$7.48B
5Y Perf.+94.9%
BG vs MOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BG | MOS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $24.46B | $7.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80.54B | $11.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $686M | $1.22B |
| Gross Margin | 5.2% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $16.95B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.14B | $277M |
BG vs MOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BG
MOS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 323.0 | +223.0% |
| The Mosaic Company (MOS) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BG vs MOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BG leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Mosaic Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Income Pick
BG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 142.9% 10Y total return vs MOS's 12.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MOS
The Mosaic Company
The Quality Compounder
MOS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 10.5% margin vs BG's 0.9%
- 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.2%
- 5.0% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 3.3%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BG | 32.4% revenue growth vs MOS's 5.0% |
| Value | BG | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MOS | 10.5% margin vs BG's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | BG | Beta 0.25 vs MOS's 0.52 |
| Dividends | MOS | 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BG | +64.9% vs MOS's -19.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MOS | 5.0% ROA vs BG's 1.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 3.3% |
BG vs MOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
BG vs MOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMOSLAGGINGBG
BGBunge Global S.A.
2leads
MOSThe Mosaic Company
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MOS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MOS3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MOS9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BG6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BG is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.5B annually — 6.9x MOS's $11.7B. MOS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BG's 0.9%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80.5B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $686M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $112M | -$535M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +87.8% | -7.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.4% | +3.8% |
MOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, MOS trades at a 76% valuation discount to BG's 25.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOS's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 22.8x.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.5B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40.3B | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.62x | 6.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.64x | 16.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.84x | 3.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
MOS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOS delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $4 for BG. MOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MOS scores 7/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.8B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $277M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.0B | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.10x | 8.81x |
MOS leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $15,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,709 for MOS. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +64.9% total return vs MOS's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 14.2% vs MOS's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.8% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.9% | -19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.7% | -31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.8% | -22.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.9% | +12.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.2% | -11.6% |
BG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BG is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOS's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BG currently trades 94.1% from its 52-week high vs MOS's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.93 | $38.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.60 | $22.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.1% | +61.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 39.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 9.7M |
BG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BG and MOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BG as "Buy" and MOS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.6% upside for MOS (target: $31) vs 6.0% for BG (target: $134). For income investors, MOS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs BG's 2.19%.
| Metric | BGBunge Global S.A. | MOSThe Mosaic Company |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $133.67 | $31.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.76 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — BG and MOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallThe Mosaic Company (MOS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BG vs MOS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BG or MOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for The Mosaic Company (MOS). The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BG or MOS?
On trailing P/E, The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus Bunge Global S. A. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, Bunge Global S. A. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BG or MOS?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +55. 8%, compared to -22. 9% for The Mosaic Company (MOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BG returned +142. 9% versus MOS's +12. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BG or MOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus The Mosaic Company's 0. 52β — meaning MOS is approximately 110% more volatile than BG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Mosaic Company (MOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BG or MOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus 5. 0% for The Mosaic Company (MOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Mosaic Company grew EPS 605. 5% year-over-year, compared to -38. 4% for Bunge Global S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BG or MOS?
The Mosaic Company (MOS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus 1. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOS leads at 9. 9% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MOS leads at 16. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BG or MOS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for The Mosaic Company — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOS: 32. 6% to $31. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BG or MOS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Mosaic Company (MOS) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. (BG).
09Is BG or MOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), 2. 2% yield, +142. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BG: +142. 9%, MOS: +12. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BG and MOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BG (Consumer Defensive) and MOS (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MOS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(BG: 87.8% · MOS: -7.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BG: 25.6x · MOS: 6.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.