Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4M | $6M | $426M | $10.18B | $1.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $0.00 | $160M | $622M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-27M | $-129M | $-301M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | — | 37.1% | 88.1% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | -24.8% | — | -101.7% | -35.7% | -6.5% |
| Total Debt | $211K | $38K | $759M | $366M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $6M | $64M | $227M | $155M |
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioNexus Gene Lab C… (BGLC) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Pacific Biosciences… (PACB) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 104.9 | +4.9% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGLC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 3.81x
RNAZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.80
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 2.56x
- -0.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
- Beta 0.80 vs PACB's 2.41
PACB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 11.6% 10Y total return vs NTLA's -41.3%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4%
- +448.5% vs RNAZ's -25.4%
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs NTLA's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs PACB's 2.41 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +448.5% vs RNAZ's -25.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.5% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2% |
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
BGLC leads 1 • RNAZ leads 0 • PACB leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BGLC and ARWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARWR and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $622M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -24.3% (BGLC) to -6.1% (NTLA). On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $0 | $160M | $622M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$17M | -$151M | -$203M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$27M | -$129M | -$301M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$15M | -$116M | -$51M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | — | +37.1% | +88.1% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.8% | — | -101.7% | -35.7% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.3% | — | -80.3% | -48.4% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.5% | — | -72.6% | -8.2% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | — | +0.1% | -86.4% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.0% | -380.7% | +97.9% | -133.8% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BGLC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $6M | $426M | $10.2B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$465,880 | $329,787 | $1.1B | $10.3B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.29x | -0.16x | -0.77x | -5957.38x | -3.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 84.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | — | 2.66x | 12.27x | 24.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | — | 79.07x | 19.31x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 64.87x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNAZ delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PACB. BGLC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs BGLC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | -1.9% | -2.5% | -55.5% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.1% | -0.5% | -16.1% | -18.1% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.4% | — | -45.8% | +9.3% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.2% | -5.1% | -58.0% | +8.8% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | — | 141.98x | 0.73x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$6M | $696M | $140M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $6M | $64M | $227M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210,557 | $38,291 | $759M | $366M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.94x | -3431.07x | -44.67x | -1.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $10,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +448.5% total return vs RNAZ's -25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 21.6% vs RNAZ's -96.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.7% | -1.1% | -23.4% | +7.2% | +53.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.8% | -25.4% | +17.5% | +448.5% | +70.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -100.0% | -88.5% | +79.7% | -67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | -100.0% | -93.9% | +10.0% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -100.0% | -84.0% | +1161.8% | -41.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.7% | -96.4% | -51.4% | +21.6% | -31.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RNAZ and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNAZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACB's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs BGLC's 13.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 0.80x | 2.41x | 1.74x | 2.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.60 | $20.99 | $2.73 | $79.48 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.92 | $6.08 | $0.85 | $12.44 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.2% | +34.9% | +51.6% | +91.4% | +49.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 42.4 | 55.7 | 66.3 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 8K | 6.0M | 1.9M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PACB as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.9% upside for NTLA (target: $20) vs -29.1% for PACB (target: $1).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $1.00 | $82.33 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 18 | 20 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BGLC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BGLC vs RNAZ vs PACB vs ARWR vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 7% for BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC). Analysts rate Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) delivered a total return of +10. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1162% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 's 2. 41β — meaning PACB is approximately 202% more volatile than RNAZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -2. 7% for BioNexus Gene Lab Corp. (BGLC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -70. 1% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA?
TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BGLC or RNAZ or PACB or ARWR or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1162% 10Y return). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1162%, PACB: -84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BGLC and RNAZ and PACB and ARWR and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BGLC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PACB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.