Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Industrial Materials
Gold
Gold
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Gold | Industrial Materials | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $2M | $231M | $2.03B | $12.13B | $11.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $93M | $109M | $1.57B | $2.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-6M | $-61M | $559M | $799M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 18.9% | 3.3% | 50.9% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 13.1% | -25.5% | 44.1% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.6x | 26.3x | 19.1x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $91M | $24M | $299M | $365M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $25M | $20M | $242M | $554M |
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BGM Group Ltd. (BGM) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO) | 100 | 379.0 | +279.0% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 1286.3 | +1186.3% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 305.0 | +205.0% |
| Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) | 100 | 295.0 | +195.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.67
GORO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
- Beta 0.38 vs USAS's 2.31
USAS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +418.7% vs BGM's -97.4%
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs CDE's 149.9%
- 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
- 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%
CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
- 96.4% revenue growth vs BGM's -46.0%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% revenue growth vs BGM's -46.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs USAS's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +418.7% vs BGM's -97.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3% |
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BGM leads in 2 of 6 categories
HL leads 1 • CDE leads 1 • USAS leads 1 • GORO leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 102.2x BGM's $25M. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $93M | $109M | $1.6B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $25M | -$7M | $853M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$6M | -$61M | $559M | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$4M | -$52M | $472M | $915M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +18.9% | +3.3% | +50.9% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +13.1% | -25.5% | +44.1% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -6.9% | -56.2% | +35.6% | +31.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -4.2% | -47.7% | +30.0% | +35.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% | +45.6% | +57.4% | +137.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +193.3% | +55.3% | -160.0% | +4.9% |
Valuation Metrics
BGM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $231M | $2.0B | $12.1B | $11.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $297M | $2.0B | $12.2B | $11.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.43x | -30.43x | -15.19x | 36.92x | 20.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.60x | 26.30x | 19.07x | 9.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -11.51x | 11.93x | — | 17.25x | 11.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 2.48x | 20.24x | 8.53x | 5.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 4.46x | 12.65x | 4.58x | 3.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 359.20x | — | 39.11x | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. CDE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -22.7% | -122.1% | +22.5% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -4.0% | -26.1% | +16.3% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +13.5% | -26.3% | +15.3% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +8.2% | -21.6% | +16.8% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.07x | 0.45x | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $66M | $4M | $57M | -$188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $25M | $20M | $242M | $554M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $91M | $24M | $299M | $365M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.88x | 0.73x | -18.89x | 19.04x | 47.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $975 for BGM. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs BGM's -97.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs BGM's -62.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -92.0% | +70.2% | +24.9% | -4.1% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.4% | +143.4% | +418.7% | +271.0% | +216.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +50.5% | +490.7% | +194.9% | +414.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -45.8% | +35.7% | +150.3% | +96.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -47.8% | -5.1% | +360.6% | +149.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.7% | +14.6% | +80.8% | +43.4% | +72.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GORO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GORO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GORO currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs BGM's 1.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.38x | 2.31x | 1.26x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.17 | $1.87 | $10.50 | $34.17 | $27.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $0.43 | $1.06 | $4.68 | $5.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.7% | +76.5% | +60.8% | +52.9% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.4 | 47.9 | 56.3 | 46.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 280K | 1.8M | 5.8M | 15.4M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BGM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GORO as "Buy", USAS as "Buy", HL as "Hold", CDE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 31.7% for HL (target: $24).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.00 | $9.75 | $23.83 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 4 | 26 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.1% |
BGM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
BGM vs GORO vs USAS vs HL vs CDE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -46. 0% for BGM Group Ltd. (BGM). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to -90. 3% for BGM Group Ltd. (BGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus BGM's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 513% more volatile than GORO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus -46. 0% for BGM Group Ltd. (BGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.
(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BGM or GORO or USAS or HL or CDE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38)). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GORO: -47. 8%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BGM and GORO and USAS and HL and CDE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BGM (Healthcare) and GORO (Basic Materials) and USAS (Basic Materials) and HL (Basic Materials) and CDE (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.