Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BGSF
BGSF, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.-50.2%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$349M
5Y Perf.-35.3%
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-56.0%
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.77B
5Y Perf.-46.0%
ASGN
ASGN Incorporated

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$895M
5Y Perf.-37.1%

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BGSF logoBGSF
KELYA logoKELYA
MAN logoMAN
RHI logoRHI
ASGN logoASGN
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$58M$349M$1.41B$2.77B$895M
Revenue (TTM)$51M$3.09B$17.96B$5.38B$3.98B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-266M$-13M$133M$114M
Gross Margin35.9%26.3%16.7%36.8%28.4%
Operating Margin-21.7%-2.8%0.8%1.4%6.1%
Forward P/E11.0x8.3x20.8x5.8x
Total Debt$2M$159M$2.39B$421M$1.17B
Cash & Equiv.$19M$33M$871M$464M$102M

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BGSF
KELYA
MAN
RHI
ASGN
StockMay 20May 26Return
BGSF, Inc. (BGSF)10049.8-50.2%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10064.7-35.3%
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN)10044.0-56.0%
Robert Half Interna… (RHI)10054.0-46.0%
ASGN Incorporated (ASGN)10062.9-37.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BGSF leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. ASGN Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MAN and RHI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BGSF
BGSF, Inc.
The Income Pick

BGSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 38.9%
  • -15.8% 10Y total return vs RHI's 10.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 4.12x
  • Beta 0.95, yield 38.9%, current ratio 4.12x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
The Growth Play

MAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth -109.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.2%
  • 0.6% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8%
Best for: growth exposure
RHI
Robert Half International Inc.
The Niche Pick

RHI is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 4.7% ROA vs BGSF's -12.6%, ROIC 4.6% vs -8.5%
Best for: efficiency
ASGN
ASGN Incorporated
The Value Play

ASGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (5.8x vs 20.8x)
  • 2.9% margin vs BGSF's -21.2%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMAN logoMAN0.6% revenue growth vs BGSF's -65.8%
ValueASGN logoASGNLower P/E (5.8x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsASGN logoASGN2.9% margin vs BGSF's -21.2%
Stability / SafetyBGSF logoBGSFBeta 0.95 vs ASGN's 1.34, lower leverage
DividendsBGSF logoBGSF38.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RHI's 8.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BGSF logoBGSF+125.0% vs ASGN's -61.5%
Efficiency (ROA)RHI logoRHI4.7% ROA vs BGSF's -12.6%, ROIC 4.6% vs -8.5%

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BGSFBGSF, Inc.
FY 2025
Property Management
100.0%$93M
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B
MANManpowerGroup Inc.
FY 2024
StaffingandInterim
87.5%$15.7B
Outcome-BasedSolutionsandConsulting
7.0%$1.3B
PermanentRecruitment
2.7%$492M
Other
2.7%$482M
Franchise
0.1%$14M
RHIRobert Half International Inc.
FY 2025
Contract Talent Solutions
83.4%$2.2B
Permanent Placement Staffing
16.6%$440M
ASGNASGN Incorporated
FY 2025
Commercial Business
70.1%$2.8B
Federal Government Business
29.9%$1.2B

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBGSFLAGGINGRHI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ASGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 352.4x BGSF's $51M. ASGN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGSF's -21.2%. On growth, MAN holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$3.1B$18.0B$5.4B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M-$54M$236M$150M$360M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$266M-$13M$133M$114M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$987,000$66M-$161M$267M$288M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.9%+26.3%+16.7%+36.8%+28.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.7%-2.8%+0.8%+1.4%+6.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-21.2%-8.6%-0.1%+2.5%+2.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.9%+2.1%-0.9%+5.0%+7.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-67.0%-100.0%+7.1%-5.8%-0.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%-2.1%+36.2%-39.6%-37.9%
ASGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KELYA and MAN and ASGN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, ASGN trades at a 61% valuation discount to RHI's 20.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASGN's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RHI's 21.6x.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
Market CapShares × price$58M$349M$1.4B$2.8B$895M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M$475M$2.9B$2.7B$2.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.43x-1.34x-104.90x20.60x8.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.96x8.28x20.76x5.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.02x21.57x5.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.63x0.08x0.08x0.52x0.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x0.35x0.69x2.15x0.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.06x10.39x3.11x
Evenly matched — KELYA and MAN and ASGN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RHI and ASGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

RHI delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. BGSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KELYA scores 5/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-19.3%-24.6%-0.6%+10.3%+6.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.6%-11.3%-0.1%+4.7%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.5%-4.0%+5.6%+4.6%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.8%-4.3%+6.2%+5.0%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945145
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.16x1.16x0.33x0.65x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$17M$126M$1.5B-$43M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$19M$33M$871M$464M$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$159M$2.4B$421M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.88x-12.07x1.98x1.96x
Evenly matched — RHI and ASGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BGSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BGSF five years ago would be worth $6,776 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,958 for ASGN. Over the past 12 months, BGSF leads with a +125.0% total return vs ASGN's -61.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BGSF at -7.3% vs ASGN's -31.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.3%+13.1%+1.2%+2.4%-55.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+125.0%-12.2%-17.0%-31.4%-61.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-20.4%-34.2%-46.4%-49.5%-68.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.2%-58.3%-64.9%-58.8%-80.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.8%-33.0%-30.8%+10.2%-41.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.3%-13.0%-18.8%-20.4%-31.7%
BGSF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BGSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASGN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KELYA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs ASGN's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x1.01x1.03x0.99x1.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.22$14.94$47.34$48.54$60.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.20$7.98$25.15$21.84$19.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+63.3%+64.9%+64.3%+56.4%+34.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.863.747.149.418.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded22K361K1.1M2.9M947K
Evenly matched — BGSF and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BGSF and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KELYA as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", RHI as "Hold", ASGN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.4% upside for ASGN (target: $38) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, BGSF offers the higher dividend yield at 38.85% vs KELYA's 3.23%.

MetricBGSF logoBGSFBGSF, Inc.KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…MAN logoMANManpowerGroup Inc.RHI logoRHIRobert Half Inter…ASGN logoASGNASGN Incorporated
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$37.86$40.67$37.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts5292513
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+38.9%+3.2%+4.7%+8.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15022
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.02$0.31$1.43$2.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.6%+3.5%+2.7%+3.3%+19.0%
Evenly matched — BGSF and RHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ASGN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BGSF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallBGSF, Inc. (BGSF)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BGSF vs KELYA vs MAN vs RHI vs ASGN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

On trailing P/E, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the cheapest at 8.

1x versus Robert Half International Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, ASGN Incorporated is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

Over the past 5 years, BGSF, Inc.

(BGSF) delivered a total return of -32. 2%, compared to -80. 4% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHI returned +10. 2% versus ASGN's -41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BGSF, Inc.

(BGSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 40% more volatile than BGSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ManpowerGroup Inc.

(MAN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -65. 8% for BGSF, Inc. (BGSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASGN Incorporated grew EPS -32. 1% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAN leads at -3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

9% net margin versus -8. 3% for BGSF, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASGN leads at 6. 5% versus -10. 0% for BGSF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RHI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) trades at 5.

8x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Robert Half International Inc. — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASGN: 79. 4% to $37. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN?

In this comparison, BGSF (38.

9% yield), RHI (8. 7% yield), MAN (4. 7% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ASGN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BGSF or KELYA or MAN or RHI or ASGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BGSF, Inc.

(BGSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 38. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGSF: -15. 8%, ASGN: -41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BGSF and KELYA and MAN and RHI and ASGN?

These companies operate in different sectors (BGSF (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and MAN (Industrials) and RHI (Industrials) and ASGN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BGSF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. BGSF, KELYA, MAN, RHI pay a dividend while ASGN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BGSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
  • Dividend Yield > 15.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KELYA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MAN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RHI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASGN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BGSF and KELYA and MAN and RHI and ASGN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BGSF: -67.0% · KELYA: -100.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.