Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Asset Management
Real Estate - Services
Asset Management
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Conglomerates | Asset Management | Real Estate - Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $622M | $905M | $89.45B | $406M | $95.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $387M | $1.85B | $19.26B | $42M | $13.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-227M | $2.37B | $5M | $3.02B |
| Gross Margin | 35.6% | 38.7% | 41.8% | 64.1% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 19.5% | 51.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 150.4x | 16.4x | 17.6x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $150M | $1.88B | $54.77B | $179M | $13.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $68M | $6M | $149M | $2.63B |
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biglari Holdings In… (BH) | 100 | 494.0 | +394.0% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 361.5 | +261.5% |
| FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +26.8% vs CODI's -30.3%
Among these 5 stocks, CODI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BX's 476.1%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 20.5x)
FRPH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth 21.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 15.45x
- Beta 0.66, current ratio 15.45x
- Beta 0.66 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage
BX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.53, yield 6.3%
- 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- 21.8% margin vs CODI's -12.3%
- 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs CODI's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.8% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 16.1% vs 1.0% |
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories
BH leads 1 • KKR leads 1 • FRPH leads 1 • CODI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 453.6x FRPH's $42M. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODI's -12.3%. On growth, BH holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $387M | $1.8B | $19.3B | $42M | $13.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $73M | $109M | $9.0B | $19M | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$227M | $2.4B | $5M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $81M | $10M | $7.5B | $29M | $3.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +38.7% | +41.8% | +64.1% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +0.3% | +2.4% | +19.5% | +51.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -12.3% | +12.3% | +10.9% | +21.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +0.5% | +49.4% | +67.9% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.3% | -5.9% | — | +1.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.5% | -5.1% | -1.7% | -51.5% | +41.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.5x trailing earnings, BX trades at a 50% valuation discount to FRPH's 62.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BH's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $622M | $905M | $89.4B | $406M | $95.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $742M | $2.7B | $144.2B | $436M | $106.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -111.79x | -3.94x | 42.88x | 62.53x | 31.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 150.38x | 16.42x | 17.57x | 20.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.78x | 14.99x | 20.24x | 19.76x | 14.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 0.48x | 4.64x | 9.73x | 6.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 1.58x | 1.17x | 0.86x | 4.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.63x | — | 9.39x | 14.02x | 54.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. BH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs BH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.4% | -49.6% | +3.2% | +1.0% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | -7.3% | +0.6% | +0.6% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +1.8% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +2.4% | +0.1% | +1.7% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 3.27x | 0.67x | 0.38x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $1.8B | $54.8B | $30M | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $68M | $6M | $149M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $150M | $1.9B | $54.8B | $179M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | -0.97x | 3.29x | 3.72x | 14.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BH five years ago would be worth $20,319 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,447 for CODI. Over the past 12 months, BH leads with a +26.8% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.6% vs CODI's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +158.7% | -22.0% | -6.6% | -21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | -30.3% | -13.0% | -23.0% | -6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.7% | -25.6% | +107.7% | -23.9% | +65.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.2% | -35.5% | +76.5% | -26.4% | +59.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.5% | +53.7% | +715.5% | +26.8% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | -9.4% | +27.6% | -8.7% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FRPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPH currently trades 74.9% from its 52-week high vs BH's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.09x | 1.70x | 0.66x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $483.60 | $17.46 | $153.87 | $28.38 | $190.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $230.12 | $4.58 | $82.67 | $20.54 | $101.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +68.9% | +65.2% | +74.9% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 70.0 | 52.4 | 41.4 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 1.2M | 6.5M | 60K | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KKR and BX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BH as "Buy", CODI as "Hold", KKR as "Buy", BX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 24.7% for CODI (target: $15). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.30% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $143.00 | — | $156.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | 26 | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.2% | +0.8% | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 6 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.50 | $0.80 | — | $7.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BH vs CODI vs KKR vs FRPH vs BX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Blackstone Inc. (BX) offers the better valuation at 31. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biglari Holdings Inc. (BH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
On trailing P/E, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the cheapest at 31. 5x versus FRP Holdings, Inc. at 62. 5x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
Over the past 5 years, Biglari Holdings Inc.
(BH) delivered a total return of +103. 2%, compared to -35. 5% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus BH's +24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FRP Holdings, Inc.
(FRPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning KKR is approximately 158% more volatile than FRPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Biglari Holdings Inc. (BH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FRP Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 21. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPH leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 2. 3% for CODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPH leads at 91. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 134. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 42. 5% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX?
In this comparison, BX (6.
3% yield), CODI (4. 2% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BH, FRPH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BH or CODI or KKR or FRPH or BX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODI: +53. 7%, BH: +24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BH and CODI and KKR and FRPH and BX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BH (Consumer Cyclical) and CODI (Industrials) and KKR (Financial Services) and FRPH (Real Estate) and BX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FRPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CODI, KKR, BX pay a dividend while BH, FRPH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.