REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BHR vs RLJ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
BHR vs RLJ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $176M | $1.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $704M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | -1.1% | 1.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 593.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $410M |
BHR vs RLJ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braemar Hotels & Re… (BHR) | 100 | 80.4 | -19.6% |
| RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) | 100 | 85.8 | -14.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHR vs RLJ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BHR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.71, yield 27.3%, current ratio 2.18x
- 27.3% yield, vs RLJ's 7.0%
- +39.7% vs RLJ's +34.6%
RLJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 7.0%
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth -94.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- -28.7% 10Y total return vs BHR's -54.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% FFO/revenue growth vs BHR's -3.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.8% margin vs BHR's -3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs BHR's 1.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.3% yield, vs RLJ's 7.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.7% vs RLJ's +34.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.5% ROA vs BHR's -1.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs 1.9% |
BHR vs RLJ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BHR vs RLJ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLJ is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 1.9x BHR's $704M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (RLJ) to -3.2% (BHR). On growth, RLJ holds the edge at +3.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $704M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $136M | $316M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $254M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +1.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +18.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -150.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BHR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BHR's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RLJ's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $176M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.11x | 593.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.04x | 10.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RLJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RLJ delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BHR. RLJ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHR's 2.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLJ scores 6/9 vs BHR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.24x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $410M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 1.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RLJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RLJ five years ago would be worth $6,844 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,662 for BHR. Over the past 12 months, BHR leads with a +39.7% total return vs RLJ's +34.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RLJ at -1.2% vs BHR's -7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | +16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.7% | +34.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | -3.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.4% | -31.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | -28.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
RLJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHR's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RLJ currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs BHR's 80.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.19 | $8.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.92 | $6.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BHR and RLJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BHR as "Hold" and RLJ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 284.0% upside for BHR (target: $10) vs -31.7% for RLJ (target: $6). For income investors, BHR offers the higher dividend yield at 27.35% vs RLJ's 6.95%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.83 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +27.3% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.70 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +44.1% | +2.4% |
RLJ leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BHR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BHR vs RLJ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHR or RLJ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the stronger pick with -1.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR). RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) offers the better valuation at 593. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BHR or RLJ?
Over the past 5 years, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) delivered a total return of -31.
6%, compared to -53. 4% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RLJ returned -29. 9% versus BHR's -54. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BHR or RLJ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning BHR is approximately 73% more volatile than RLJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 106% versus 2% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BHR or RLJ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is pulling ahead at -1.
4% versus -3. 3% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. grew EPS 53. 2% year-over-year, compared to -94. 5% for RLJ Lodging Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLJ leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BHR or RLJ?
RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
1% net margin versus -3. 2% for Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RLJ leads at 9. 3% versus 6. 1% for BHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLJ leads at -0. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BHR or RLJ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR) offers the highest yield at 27. 3%, versus 7. 0% for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ).
07Is BHR or RLJ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 7. 0% yield). Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. (BHR) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RLJ: -29. 9%, BHR: -54. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BHR and RLJ?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.