Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.03B | $1.69B | $19.53B | $150.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $55M | $5.36B | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-648M | $-164M | $1.43B | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.6% | 91.9% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -237.9% | 26.8% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.1x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $279M | $149M | $69M | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $230M | $15M | $3.10B | $1.14B |
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) | 100 | 154.5 | +54.5% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 173.7 | +73.7% |
| Incyte Corporation (INCY) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BHVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 27.3% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs BHVN's -48.8%
INCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.2%, EPS growth 41.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.8%
- 34.2% 10Y total return vs BHVN's 33.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 3.32x
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.54 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
- 6.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.3% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.7% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs BHVN's -48.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.7% ROA vs BHVN's -138.0%, ROIC 51.1% vs -242.1% |
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INCY leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFE leads 2 • NKTR leads 1 • BHVN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INCY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and BHVN operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. INCY is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, INCY holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $55M | $5.4B | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$646M | -$130M | $1.5B | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$648M | -$164M | $1.4B | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$594M | -$209M | $1.5B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +99.6% | +91.9% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.4% | +26.8% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -3.0% | +26.7% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.8% | +27.1% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% | +20.9% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | -4.5% | +83.8% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, INCY trades at a 22% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INCY's 11.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $1.7B | $19.5B | $150.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1.8B | $16.5B | $216.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.42x | -8.57x | 15.25x | 19.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.06x | 8.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.49x | 10.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.64x | 3.80x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.12x | 15.66x | 3.80x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.42x | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INCY leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INCY delivers a 29.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BHVN. INCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHVN's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INCY scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | -4.0% | +29.3% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.0% | -62.8% | +21.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | -57.2% | +51.1% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -187.2% | -55.7% | +29.0% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.36x | 1.66x | 0.01x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | $134M | -$3.0B | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $230M | $15M | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $279M | $149M | $69M | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -4.74x | 759.79x | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BHVN five years ago would be worth $13,336 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,765 for NKTR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs BHVN's -48.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs BHVN's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | +92.0% | -3.6% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.8% | +818.2% | +64.2% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +621.8% | +48.6% | -18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | -72.3% | +18.2% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | -59.1% | +34.2% | +29.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.8% | +93.3% | +14.1% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs BHVN's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.85x | 0.87x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.05 | $109.00 | $112.29 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.48 | $7.99 | $57.77 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.1% | +76.5% | +87.1% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 53.4 | 59.4 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 991K | 1.4M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BHVN as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", INCY as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 118.7% upside for BHVN (target: $21) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). PFE is the only dividend payer here at 6.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $132.83 | $109.50 | $27.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 33 | 44 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
INCY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
BHVN vs NKTR vs INCY vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the stronger pick with 21.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Incyte Corporation (INCY) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the cheapest at 15.
3x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Biohaven Ltd.
(BHVN) delivered a total return of +33. 4%, compared to -72. 3% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INCY returned +34. 2% versus NKTR's -59. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 240% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Incyte Corporation (INCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Biohaven Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Incyte Corporation (INCY) is pulling ahead at 21.
2% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Incyte Corporation grew EPS 41. 7% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, INCY leads at 14. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
Incyte Corporation (INCY) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
0% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 25. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INCY leads at 26. 1% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Incyte Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BHVN: 118. 7% to $21. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BHVN, NKTR, INCY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BHVN or NKTR or INCY or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 5% yield). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +29. 6%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BHVN and NKTR and INCY and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BHVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INCY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. PFE pays a dividend while BHVN, NKTR, INCY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.