Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) vs Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) vs Opera Limited (OPRA) vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs trivago N.V. (TRVG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NBIS | 350.9% revenue growth vs BIDU's -1.1% |
| Value | BIDU | Lower P/E (2.1x vs 16.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | NBIS | 19.0% net margin vs TRVG's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | BIDU | Beta 0.89 vs NBIS's 2.44, lower leverage |
| Dividends | OPRA | 2.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; BIDU, NBIS, PINS, TRVG pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NBIS | +180.7% vs PINS's -53.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OPRA | 7.7% ROA vs NBIS's 0.8%, ROIC 8.3% vs -13.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Baidu operates China's dominant internet search engine and AI-powered online platform. It generates most revenue from online marketing services — primarily search and feed-based ads — with cloud services and AI initiatives contributing growing shares. Its moat stems from its entrenched search dominance in China, massive user data for AI training, and regulatory barriers that limit foreign competition.
Nebius Group is a technology company that builds full-stack infrastructure for the global AI industry, including cloud platforms, GPU clusters, and developer tools. It generates revenue primarily through its Nebius AI cloud platform—which serves intensive AI workloads—alongside data services from Toloka AI, edtech from TripleTen, and autonomous driving technology from Avride. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated full-stack approach to AI infrastructure—combining hardware, cloud services, and specialized tools—and its established R&D expertise across multiple AI domains.
Opera Limited is a web browser company offering mobile and desktop browsers with integrated services like news aggregation and gaming features. It generates revenue primarily through advertising—including its Opera Ads platform—and to a lesser extent from gaming services and browser-based cashback rewards. The company's advantage lies in its specialized browser offerings—particularly Opera GX for gamers—and its AI-powered news discovery service that creates a differentiated ecosystem beyond basic browsing.
Pinterest is a visual discovery platform where users find inspiration for everything from recipes to home decor through personalized image and video pins. It generates revenue primarily through advertising — selling promoted pins and shopping ads to brands — with advertising accounting for nearly all of its revenue. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique intent-based discovery model where users actively seek inspiration, creating a high-intent advertising environment distinct from social media feeds.
Trivago operates a hotel and accommodation meta-search platform that compares prices across booking sites. It makes money primarily through cost-per-click advertising — when users click on hotel listings, trivago gets paid by online travel agencies and hotel partners. Its key advantage is brand recognition in hotel search and a massive database of accommodation options across 53 localized websites in 31 languages.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
OPRA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NBIS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 244.2x NBIS's $534M. NBIS is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRVG's 2.0%. On growth, NBIS holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $130.5B | $534M | $583M | $4.2B | $549M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.9B | -$287M | $107M | $339M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.0B | $102M | $81M | $417M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.7B | -$2.3B | $88M | $1.3B | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +68.0% | +65.4% | +80.1% | +97.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -113.3% | +15.3% | +7.6% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +19.0% | +13.9% | +9.9% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -4.2% | +15.1% | +29.7% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.1% | +5.0% | +23.3% | +14.3% | +26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -79.3% | 0.0% | -84.7% | +191.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, BIDU trades at a 98% valuation discount to NBIS's 829.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.22x vs OPRA's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.4B | $20.0B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.3B | $21.2B | $1.3B | $616M | -$44M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.95x | 829.00x | 17.82x | 28.08x | 16.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.13x | — | 15.42x | 9.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.22x | — | 1.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.50x | — | 12.25x | 1.93x | -6.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 37.77x | 2.99x | 0.32x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 5.00x | 1.53x | 2.48x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.44x | — | 19.34x | 1.09x | 17.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for NBIS. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBIS's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBIS scores 7/9 vs TRVG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +2.2% | +8.6% | +8.8% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +0.8% | +7.7% | +7.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -13.4% | +8.3% | +6.2% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | -8.4% | +9.8% | +6.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.06x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $54.5B | $1.2B | -$117M | -$749M | -$95M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24.8B | $3.7B | $127M | $969M | $131M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $79.3B | $4.9B | $10M | $221M | $36M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.71x | -30.21x | 172.17x | 1.38x | 90.00x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NBIS five years ago would be worth $45,595 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,056 for PINS. Over the past 12 months, NBIS leads with a +180.7% total return vs PINS's -53.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBIS at 65.8% vs TRVG's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.2% | +1.4% | +18.3% | -35.5% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.9% | +180.7% | -7.7% | -53.7% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.6% | +355.9% | +107.7% | -31.8% | -33.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | +356.0% | +60.3% | -79.4% | -73.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.2% | +356.0% | +49.2% | -29.8% | -90.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +65.8% | +27.6% | -12.0% | -12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BIDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBIS's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPRA currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 2.44x | 1.48x | 1.51x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $165.30 | $141.10 | $21.06 | $39.93 | $5.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $74.71 | $18.31 | $11.71 | $13.84 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.3% | +64.6% | +76.2% | +42.9% | +50.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.7 | 57.0 | 66.8 | 38.1 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 10.7M | 586K | 13.8M | 48K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIDU as "Buy", NBIS as "Buy", OPRA as "Buy", PINS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 71.4% upside for NBIS (target: $156) vs 27.5% for BIDU (target: $159). OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 2.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BIDUBaidu, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. | OPRAOpera Limited | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $158.64 | $156.33 | $21.50 | $25.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 4 | 7 | 46 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.42 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +67.9% | +2.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 165.04 | +65.0% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 100.7 | 440.8 | +337.7% |
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 100 | 78.51 | -21.5% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 68.71 | -31.3% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 170.83 | +70.8% |
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) returned +356% over 5 years vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)'s -79%. A $10,000 investment in NBIS 5 years ago would be worth $45,595 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | $70.5B | $133.1B | +88.7% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | $1.2B | $530M | -57.1% |
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | $107M | $481M | +348.0% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | $473M | $4.2B | +792.8% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | $754M | $549M | -27.2% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s revenue grew from $1.2B (2016) to $530M (2025) — a -9.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 16.5% | 17.8% | +8.2% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 9.0% | 19.2% | +114.4% |
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | -14.7% | 16.8% | +214.0% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -27.5% | 9.9% | +135.9% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -6.7% | 2.0% | +130.4% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s net margin went from 9% (2016) to 19% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 4.5 | 1.3 | -71.1% |
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 16.4 | 21 | +28.0% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 88.7 | 42.4 | -52.2% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 52.4 | 19.3 | -63.2% |
Baidu, Inc. has traded in a 1x–20x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x. Opera Limited has traded in a 6x–45x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 33.44 | 65.92 | +97.1% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 0.34 | 0.11 | -67.6% |
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | -0.14 | 0.9 | +742.9% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -0.29 | 0.61 | +310.3% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -1.05 | 0.15 | +114.3% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s EPS grew from $0.34 (2016) to $0.11 (2025) — a -12% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Baidu, Inc. generated $13B FCF in 2024 (+47% vs 2021). Nebius Group N.V. generated $-4B FCF in 2025 (-677% vs 2021).
BIDU vs NBIS vs OPRA vs PINS vs TRVG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG a better buy right now?
Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 13.0x trailing P/E (2.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG?
On trailing P/E, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the cheapest at 13.0x versus Nebius Group N.V. at 829.0x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2.1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0.04x versus Opera Limited's 1.24x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG?
Over the past 5 years, Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) delivered a total return of +356.0%, compared to -79.4% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). A $10,000 investment in NBIS five years ago would be worth approximately $46K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBIS returned +356.0% versus TRVG's -90.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.89β versus Nebius Group N.V.'s 2.44β — meaning NBIS is approximately 173% more volatile than BIDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for Nebius Group N.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG?
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) is the more profitable company, earning 19.2% net margin versus 2.0% for trivago N.V. — meaning it keeps 19.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRA leads at 19.2% versus -112.5% for NBIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRVG leads at 97.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.04x versus Opera Limited's 1.24x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) trades at 2.1x forward P/E versus 15.4x for Opera Limited — 13.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBIS: 71.4% to $156.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG?
In this comparison, OPRA (2.6% yield) pays a dividend. BIDU, NBIS, PINS, TRVG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BIDU or NBIS or OPRA or PINS or TRVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.6% yield). Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) carries a higher beta of 2.44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OPRA: +49.2%, NBIS: +356.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BIDU and NBIS and OPRA and PINS and TRVG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NBIS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OPRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; PINS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRVG is a small-cap deep-value stock. OPRA pays a dividend while BIDU, NBIS, PINS, TRVG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 250%
- Net Margin > 11%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 13%
- Gross Margin > 58%