Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $7.32B | $2.16B | $1.18B | $8.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.38B | $10.29B | $27.11B | $3.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $220M | $800M | $-390M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 37.7% | 21.9% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 12.7% | 1.7% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 3.1x | 1.1x | 4.8x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.15B | $129M | $14.19B | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.25B | $5.44B | $3.53B | $1.03B |
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilibili Inc. (BILI) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 7.3 | -92.7% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BILI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 72.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs IQ's -8.3%
- +25.0% vs IQ's -36.0%
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
- Lower P/E (1.1x vs 13.5x)
IQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MTCH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs MOMO's -9.4%
- 18.8% margin vs IQ's -1.4%
- 15.3% ROA vs IQ's -0.9%, ROIC 23.7% vs 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs IQ's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs IQ's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs MTCH's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs IQ's -36.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.3% ROA vs IQ's -0.9%, ROIC 23.7% vs 5.8% |
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories
IQ leads 1 • MOMO leads 1 • BILI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 8.3x MTCH's $3.5B. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQ's -1.4%. On growth, BILI holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.4B | $10.3B | $27.1B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $845M | $1.4B | $6.3B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $220M | $800M | -$390M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.3B | $685M | $466M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +37.7% | +21.9% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +12.7% | +1.7% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +7.8% | -1.4% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +6.7% | +1.7% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | -5.1% | -7.8% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +134.9% | +32.1% | -2.1% | +45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IQ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 38% valuation discount to MTCH's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILI's 38.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $2.2B | $1.2B | $8.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $1.4B | $2.7B | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.31x | 9.34x | 10.69x | 15.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.06x | 1.08x | 4.83x | 13.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.62x | 6.91x | 10.27x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 1.46x | 0.27x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.42x | 0.66x | 0.60x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.69x | 21.90x | 4.13x | 8.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IQ. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BILI scores 7/9 vs IQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +7.2% | -2.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +5.3% | -0.9% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.4% | +10.9% | +5.8% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | +10.8% | +7.8% | +23.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.01x | 1.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.1B | -$5.3B | $10.7B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.2B | $5.4B | $3.5B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $129M | $14.2B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.10x | 18.04x | 0.77x | 6.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $6,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, BILI leads with a +25.0% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTCH at 4.4% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | +1.6% | -40.4% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +16.2% | -36.0% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | -5.7% | -79.6% | +13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -36.7% | -91.2% | -74.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.6% | -9.4% | -92.2% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | -1.9% | -41.1% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOMO and MTCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILI's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTCH currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.78x | 1.43x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.40 | $9.22 | $2.84 | $39.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.45 | $5.68 | $1.07 | $26.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.4% | +68.8% | +42.6% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 61.2 | 45.6 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 648K | 11.1M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MOMO and IQ and MTCH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BILI as "Buy", MOMO as "Buy", IQ as "Buy", MTCH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.5% upside for IQ (target: $2) vs 0.5% for MTCH (target: $36). For income investors, MOMO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.61% vs MTCH's 1.98%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $8.10 | $2.16 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 16 | 22 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.6% | — | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +9.5% |
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BILI vs MOMO vs IQ vs MTCH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bilibili Inc. (BILI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Match Group, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) delivered a total return of -36. 7%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTCH returned +195. 5% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Bilibili Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning BILI is approximately 126% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -8. 3% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bilibili Inc. grew EPS 72. 3% year-over-year, compared to -60. 7% for iQIYI, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -5. 0% for Bilibili Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTCH leads at 25. 0% versus -5. 0% for BILI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTCH leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) trades at 1. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 5x for Match Group, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQ: 78. 5% to $2. 16.
08Which pays a better dividend — BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH?
In this comparison, MOMO (4.
6% yield), MTCH (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BILI, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BILI or MOMO or IQ or MTCH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Bilibili Inc. (BILI) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, BILI: +95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BILI and MOMO and IQ and MTCH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BILI (Technology) and MOMO (Communication Services) and IQ (Communication Services) and MTCH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO, MTCH pay a dividend while BILI, IQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.