BINI
Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$8K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$17.56B
5Y Perf.-88.1%
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-98.9%
WKHS
Workhorse Group Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.55T
5Y Perf.+7.9%
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BINI | RIVN | LCID | WKHS | TSLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $8K | $17.56B | $2.00B | $32M | $1.55T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $5.53B | $1.12B | $11M | $97.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-468M | $-3.52B | $-3.36B | $-64M | $3.88B |
| Gross Margin | -338.9% | -1.7% | -145.0% | -236.8% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | -28.8% | -68.9% | -339.6% | -5.6% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 213.0x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $6.65B | $861M | $16M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $3.58B | $998M | $4M | $16.51B |
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BINI
RIVN
LCID
WKHS
TSLA
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bollinger Innovatio… (BINI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Rivian Automotive, … (RIVN) | 100 | 11.9 | -88.1% |
| Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BINI and TSLA are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Tesla, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. WKHS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BINI
Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
The Income Pick
BINI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.29
- Rev growth 199.0%, EPS growth 72.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -74.5%
- 199.0% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
- Beta 1.29 vs TSLA's 2.06
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
RIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.59, current ratio 2.33x
Best for: defensive
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
The Growth Angle
Among these 5 stocks, LCID doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
WKHS
Workhorse Group Inc.
The Defensive Pick
WKHS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 36.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- +236.1% vs BINI's -100.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
TSLA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 28.6% 10Y total return vs RIVN's -85.9%
- 4.0% margin vs BINI's -50.1%
- 2.9% ROA vs BINI's -5.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -474.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BINI | 199.0% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% |
| Quality / Margins | TSLA | 4.0% margin vs BINI's -50.1% |
| Stability / Safety | BINI | Beta 1.29 vs TSLA's 2.06 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WKHS | +236.1% vs BINI's -100.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TSLA | 2.9% ROA vs BINI's -5.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -474.8% |
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2019
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2022
FY 2025
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTSLALAGGINGWKHS
Who Leads Where
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories
BINI leads 0 • RIVN leads 0 • LCID leads 0 • WKHS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓WKHSWorkhorse Group Inc.
0leads
LCIDLucid Group, Inc.
0leads
RIVNRivian Automotive, In…
0leads
BINIBollinger Innovations…
0leads
TSLATesla, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BINIvs RIVNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TSLA4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TSLA8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TSLA5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.9B annually — 10479.5x BINI's $9M. TSLA is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BINI's -50.1%. On growth, BINI holds the edge at +6.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $5.5B | $1.1B | $11M | $97.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$252M | -$3.2B | -$3.6B | -$52M | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$468M | -$3.5B | -$3.4B | -$64M | $3.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$115M | -$2.5B | -$4.7B | -$33M | $7.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -1.7% | -145.0% | -2.4% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -28.8% | -68.9% | -3.4% | -5.6% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -50.1% | -63.6% | -3.0% | -6.1% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.3% | -45.0% | -4.2% | -3.1% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | +11.4% | -100.0% | -5.0% | +15.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1418.9% | +31.3% | -44.2% | +95.9% | +11.9% |
TSLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BINI and RIVN and WKHS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7,965 | $17.6B | $2.0B | $32M | $1.55T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $20.6B | $1.9B | $44M | $1.54T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -4.62x | -0.50x | -0.07x | 381.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 212.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 9.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 146.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 3.26x | 1.48x | 4.83x | 16.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.66x | 2.64x | 0.16x | 17.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 248.44x |
Evenly matched — BINI and RIVN and WKHS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BINI. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RIVN's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | -69.6% | -193.0% | -198.1% | +4.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | -23.5% | -40.0% | -60.6% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | -36.7% | -98.7% | -77.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | -29.5% | -49.2% | -107.9% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.45x | 1.20x | 0.37x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $3.1B | -$137M | $12M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $3.6B | $998M | $4M | $16.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $6.7B | $861M | $16M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.23x | -27.31x | -146.67x | -3.84x | 17.04x |
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BINI. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs BINI's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | -26.9% | -45.7% | -34.7% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +11.6% | -73.1% | +236.1% | +49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +2.3% | -92.2% | -98.6% | +139.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -85.9% | -96.9% | -99.8% | +83.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -85.9% | -93.9% | -99.8% | +2856.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +0.8% | -57.2% | -75.9% | +33.8% |
TSLA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BINI and TSLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BINI is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs BINI's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.59x | 2.03x | 1.46x | 2.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $999999.00 | $22.69 | $33.70 | $11.80 | $498.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $11.57 | $5.62 | $0.53 | $271.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | 0.0% | +62.5% | +18.0% | +30.8% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.5 | 38.1 | 34.4 | 72.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 26.7M | 12.9M | 167K | 61.6M |
Evenly matched — BINI and TSLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RIVN as "Buy", LCID as "Hold", TSLA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 9.4% for TSLA (target: $450).
| Metric | BINIBollinger Innovat… | RIVNRivian Automotive… | LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | WKHSWorkhorse Group I… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.36 | $14.00 | — | $450.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 15 | — | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallTesla, Inc. (TSLA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BINI vs RIVN vs LCID vs WKHS vs TSLA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
(BINI) is the stronger pick with 199. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 381. 3x trailing P/E (213. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Bollinger Innovations, Inc. (BINI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus BINI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
(BINI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Tesla, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSLA is approximately 60% more volatile than BINI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 145% for Rivian Automotive, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
(BINI) is pulling ahead at 199. 0% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bollinger Innovations, Inc. grew EPS 72. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Tesla, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIVN leads at 48. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -417. 7% for Bollinger Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus -358. 1% for BINI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131.
4% to $14. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BINI or RIVN or LCID or WKHS or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bollinger Innovations, Inc.
(BINI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29)). Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BINI: -100. 0%, LCID: -93. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BINI and RIVN and LCID and WKHS and TSLA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BINI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIVN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TSLA is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BINI: 626.1% · RIVN: 11.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.