Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIPC vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
BIPC vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $4.74B | $291.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.63B | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-753M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 61.2% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $13.27B | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $430M | $182.09B |
BIPC vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIPC) | 100 | 136.6 | +36.6% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 477.0 | +377.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIPC vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIPC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.26x
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs BIPC's 124.1%
- 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs GS's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.4% vs BIPC's +8.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.9% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 1.9% vs 12.0% |
BIPC vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BIPC vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.9B annually — 34.9x BIPC's $3.6B. GS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPC's -20.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$753M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$556M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.4% | +45.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BIPC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BIPC's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GS's 34.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $291.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.6B | $726.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.18x | 23.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.91x | 34.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.67x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-36 for BIPC. GS carries lower financial leverage with a 5.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPC's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIPC scores 5/9 vs GS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.2% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.63x | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.8B | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $430M | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $27,109 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,784 for BIPC. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +73.4% total return vs BIPC's +8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 44.0% vs BIPC's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.7% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.5% | +73.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.1% | +198.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.2% | +171.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.1% | +536.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +44.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIPC and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs BIPC's 76.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.72 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.18 | $547.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIPC as "Buy" and GS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for BIPC (target: $57) vs 6.2% for GS (target: $996). GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
GS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BIPC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BIPC vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIPC or GS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BIPC or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +171. 1%, compared to -2. 2% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +536. 1% versus BIPC's +124. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BIPC or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 137% more volatile than BIPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BIPC or GS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to 59. 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BIPC or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus -6. 6% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPC leads at 61. 5% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPC leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BIPC or GS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIPC: 44.
3% to $57. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BIPC or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. BIPC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BIPC or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +536. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GS: +536. 1%, BIPC: +124. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BIPC and GS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BIPC (Utilities) and GS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BIPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while BIPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.