Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BIPC vs GS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation

Regulated Gas

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.74B
5Y Perf.+36.6%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$291.19B
5Y Perf.+377.0%

BIPC vs GS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BIPC logoBIPC
GS logoGS
IndustryRegulated GasFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$4.74B$291.19B
Revenue (TTM)$3.63B$126.85B
Net Income (TTM)$-753M$16.67B
Gross Margin63.5%41.1%
Operating Margin61.2%14.5%
Forward P/E15.8x
Total Debt$13.27B$616.93B
Cash & Equiv.$430M$182.09B

BIPC vs GSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BIPC
GS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Brookfield Infrastr… (BIPC)100136.6+36.6%
The Goldman Sachs G… (GS)100477.0+377.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BIPC vs GS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GS leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
The Income Pick

BIPC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.62
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.26x
  • Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.26x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
  • 5.4% 10Y total return vs BIPC's 124.1%
  • 17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGS logoGS17.0% NII/revenue growth vs BIPC's 6.9%
Quality / MarginsGS logoGS11.3% margin vs BIPC's -20.7%
Stability / SafetyBIPC logoBIPCBeta 0.62 vs GS's 1.47
DividendsGS logoGS1.4% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GS logoGS+73.4% vs BIPC's +8.5%
Efficiency (ROA)GS logoGS0.9% ROA vs BIPC's -3.1%, ROIC 1.9% vs 12.0%

BIPC vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BIPCBrookfield Infrastructure Corporation
FY 2025
Leasing
61.4%$1.4B
Distribution
26.5%$592M
Connections
10.9%$244M
Service Line, Other
1.3%$28M
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Global Markets
65.3%$34.9B
Investment Management
30.2%$16.1B
Platform Solutions
4.5%$2.4B

BIPC vs GS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGSLAGGINGBIPC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

GS is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.9B annually — 34.9x BIPC's $3.6B. GS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPC's -20.7%.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.6B$126.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.9B$23.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$753M$16.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$556M$15.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.5%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+61.2%+14.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-20.7%+11.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-15.3%-12.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.4%+45.8%
GS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIPC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, BIPC's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GS's 34.9x.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Market CapShares × price$4.7B$291.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17.6B$726.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.18x23.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.91x34.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.27x2.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.35x2.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.67x
BIPC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BIPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-36 for BIPC. GS carries lower financial leverage with a 5.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPC's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIPC scores 5/9 vs GS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.2%+12.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.1%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.0%+1.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.2%+3.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage6.63x5.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12.8B$434.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$430M$182.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13.3B$616.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.92x0.31x
BIPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $27,109 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,784 for BIPC. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +73.4% total return vs BIPC's +8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 44.0% vs BIPC's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.7%+3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.5%+73.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.1%+198.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.2%+171.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+124.1%+536.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.4%+44.0%
GS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BIPC and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BIPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs BIPC's 76.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x1.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$51.72$984.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$34.18$547.06
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.4%+95.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.755.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M2.0M
Evenly matched — BIPC and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BIPC as "Buy" and GS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.3% upside for BIPC (target: $57) vs 6.2% for GS (target: $996). GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBIPC logoBIPCBrookfield Infras…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.00$995.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts255
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$13.48
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.5%
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

GS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BIPC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Goldman Sachs Group, In… (GS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BIPC vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BIPC or GS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the stronger pick with 17. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BIPC or GS?

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) delivered a total return of +171. 1%, compared to -2. 2% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +536. 1% versus BIPC's +124. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BIPC or GS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

62β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 137% more volatile than BIPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BIPC or GS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is pulling ahead at 17. 0% versus 6. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to 59. 7% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BIPC or GS?

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus -6. 6% for Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPC leads at 61. 5% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPC leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BIPC or GS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIPC: 44.

3% to $57. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BIPC or GS?

In this comparison, GS (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. BIPC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is BIPC or GS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +536. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GS: +536. 1%, BIPC: +124. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BIPC and GS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BIPC (Utilities) and GS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BIPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while BIPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BIPC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BIPC and GS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BIPC: -5.9% · GS: 17.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.