Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BIRK vs NKE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • GB
Market Cap$7.18B
5Y Perf.-0.0%
NKE
NIKE, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$52.89B
5Y Perf.-56.8%

BIRK vs NKE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BIRK logoBIRK
NKE logoNKE
IndustryApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesApparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$7.18B$52.89B
Revenue (TTM)$2.14B$46.51B
Net Income (TTM)$379M$2.52B
Gross Margin58.3%41.1%
Operating Margin26.4%6.5%
Forward P/E18.8x29.8x
Total Debt$1.31B$11.02B
Cash & Equiv.$329M$7.46B

BIRK vs NKELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BIRK
NKE
StockOct 23May 26Return
Birkenstock Holding… (BIRK)100100.0-0.0%
NIKE, Inc. (NKE)10043.2-56.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BIRK vs NKE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BIRK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. NIKE, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
The Growth Play

BIRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
  • -2.8% 10Y total return vs NKE's -5.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 3.30x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
NKE
NIKE, Inc.
The Income Pick

NKE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 3.5%
  • Beta 1.17, yield 3.5%, current ratio 2.21x
  • Beta 1.17 vs BIRK's 1.20
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBIRK logoBIRK16.2% revenue growth vs NKE's -9.8%
ValueBIRK logoBIRKLower P/E (18.8x vs 29.8x)
Quality / MarginsBIRK logoBIRK17.7% margin vs NKE's 5.4%
Stability / SafetyNKE logoNKEBeta 1.17 vs BIRK's 1.20
DividendsNKE logoNKE3.5% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKE logoNKE-21.5% vs BIRK's -24.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BIRK logoBIRK7.7% ROA vs NKE's 6.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs 16.7%

BIRK vs NKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc

Segment breakdown not available.

NKENIKE, Inc.
FY 2025
Footwear
66.9%$31.0B
Apparel
33.0%$15.3B
Product and Service, Other
0.2%$74M

BIRK vs NKE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBIRKLAGGINGNKE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

NKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.5B annually — 21.8x BIRK's $2.1B. BIRK is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKE's 5.4%. On growth, BIRK holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$46.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$687M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$379M$2.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$282M$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.3%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.4%+6.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.2%+5.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.1%+0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.5%-30.8%
BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BIRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.8x trailing earnings, BIRK trades at a 14% valuation discount to NKE's 20.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIRK's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NKE's 12.5x.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7.2B$52.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.3B$56.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.77x20.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.78x29.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.32x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.80x12.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.91x1.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.28x5.00x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.20x16.18x
BIRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NKE delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $14 for BIRK. BIRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKE's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIRK scores 9/9 vs NKE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.7%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.7%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.3%+16.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.3%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.0B$3.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$329M$7.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$11.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.04x10.45x
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BIRK five years ago would be worth $9,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,733 for NKE. Over the past 12 months, NKE leads with a -21.5% total return vs BIRK's -24.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIRK at -1.0% vs NKE's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.5%-29.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.7%-21.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.8%-61.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.8%-62.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.8%-5.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.0%-27.2%
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BIRK and NKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NKE is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRK's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIRK currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs NKE's 55.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.50$80.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.06$42.09
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.6%+55.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.736.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M20.8M
Evenly matched — BIRK and NKE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NKE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BIRK as "Buy" and NKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.4% upside for NKE (target: $70) vs 42.2% for BIRK (target: $56). NKE is the only dividend payer here at 3.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…NKE logoNKENIKE, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$55.54$69.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1671
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises223
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.2%+5.6%
NKE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BIRK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBirkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BIRK vs NKE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BIRK or NKE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger pick with 16.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 8% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BIRK or NKE?

On trailing P/E, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the cheapest at 17.

8x versus NIKE, Inc. at 20. 6x. On forward P/E, Birkenstock Holding plc is actually cheaper at 18. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BIRK or NKE?

Over the past 5 years, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) delivered a total return of -2.

8%, compared to -62. 7% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIRK returned -2. 8% versus NKE's -5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BIRK or NKE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NIKE, Inc.

(NKE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Birkenstock Holding plc's 1. 20β — meaning BIRK is approximately 2% more volatile than NKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 83% for NIKE, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BIRK or NKE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is pulling ahead at 16.

2% versus -9. 8% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Birkenstock Holding plc grew EPS 83. 3% year-over-year, compared to -42. 1% for NIKE, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIRK leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BIRK or NKE?

Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

6% net margin versus 7. 0% for NIKE, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIRK leads at 26. 2% versus 8. 0% for NKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIRK leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BIRK or NKE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) trades at 18.

8x forward P/E versus 29. 8x for NIKE, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKE: 57. 4% to $69. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BIRK or NKE?

In this comparison, NKE (3.

5% yield) pays a dividend. BIRK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BIRK or NKE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NIKE, Inc.

(NKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NKE: -5. 2%, BIRK: -2. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BIRK and NKE?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BIRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NKE pays a dividend while BIRK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BIRK

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.3%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BIRK and NKE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BIRK: 11.1% · NKE: 0.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(BIRK: 17.7% · NKE: 5.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BIRK: 17.8x · NKE: 20.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.