Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
Semiconductors
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $10M | $5.23T | $742.11B | $25M | $627.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $215.94B | $37.45B | $299M | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9K | $120.07B | $4.99B | $-4M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 22.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 60.4% | 11.7% | -1.4% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.0x | 62.4x | — | 116.5x |
| Total Debt | $334K | $11.41B | $4.47B | $34M | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $28M | $14.27B |
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baiya International… (BIYA) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 198.6 | +98.6% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 443.1 | +343.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 550.0 | +450.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIYA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 243.2% 10Y total return vs AMD's 123.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 12.08
- 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
AMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 165.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
- Beta 0.19, yield 14.7%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.19 vs AMD's 2.52
- 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +494.7% vs BIYA's -77.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.0x vs 116.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs AMD's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs BIYA's -77.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 81.8% vs -7.9% |
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • BIYA leads 0 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 16858.0x BIYA's $13M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $215.9B | $37.5B | $299M | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $133.2B | $6.6B | -$1M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $120.1B | $5.0B | -$4M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $96.7B | $8.6B | $0 | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +22.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +60.4% | +11.7% | -1.4% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +55.6% | +13.3% | -1.3% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +44.8% | +22.9% | -2.3% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +73.2% | +37.8% | +15.3% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +97.8% | +90.9% | +75.8% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NVDA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.9x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 74% valuation discount to AMD's 171.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.46x vs AMD's 33.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $5.23T | $742.1B | $25M | $627.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $5.23T | $741.0B | $31M | $659.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1485.71x | 43.92x | 171.77x | -3.46x | -2120.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.00x | 62.38x | — | 116.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | 33.25x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 118.51x | 39.27x | 110.64x | — | 56.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 24.22x | 21.42x | 0.15x | 11.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.58x | 33.43x | 11.82x | 0.43x | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.57x | 54.10x | 110.19x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIYA's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.5% | +76.3% | +8.1% | -6.1% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +58.1% | +6.5% | -3.2% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | +81.8% | +4.7% | -7.9% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +97.2% | +5.7% | -9.8% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.07x | 0.07x | 0.59x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $807M | -$1.1B | $6M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $28M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $334,138 | $11.4B | $4.5B | $34M | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.04x | 545.03x | 33.19x | — | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $150,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,488 for BIYA. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs BIYA's -77.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 94.7% vs BIYA's -37.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.4% | +14.0% | +103.7% | -10.9% | +217.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -77.5% | +83.4% | +347.6% | -9.4% | +494.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | +638.6% | +378.9% | +0.0% | +307.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | +1409.1% | +499.0% | -69.2% | +129.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | +24324.1% | +12371.0% | -78.6% | +350.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.1% | +94.7% | +68.6% | +0.0% | +59.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIYA and AMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIYA is the less volatile stock with a -0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BIYA's 11.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.66x | 1.74x | 2.52x | 0.19x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.79 | $217.80 | $456.25 | $1.88 | $130.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $115.21 | $101.56 | $0.80 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.8% | +98.8% | +99.8% | +47.9% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 63.4 | 76.1 | 46.8 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 160.0M | 36.8M | 15K | 113.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for NVDA (target: $276) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.74 | $401.65 | — | $79.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 | 70 | — | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +14.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BIYA vs NVDA vs AMD vs CLPS vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 9x trailing P/E (26. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 43.
9x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 171. 8x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1409%, compared to -75.
1% for Baiya International Group Inc. Ordinary Shares (BIYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus CLPS's -78. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Baiya International Group Inc.
Ordinary Shares (BIYA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 66β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning AMD is approximately -480% more volatile than BIYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 61% for Baiya International Group Inc. Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -4. 3% for CLPS Incorporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -4. 0% for CLPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 26. 0x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 90. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 28. 1% to $275. 74.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
7% yield) pays a dividend. BIYA, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIYA or NVDA or AMD or CLPS or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Baiya International Group Inc.
Ordinary Shares (BIYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 66)). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIYA: -75. 1%, AMD: +123. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIYA and NVDA and AMD and CLPS and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while BIYA, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.