BJ vs COST

For growth investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger pick with 8.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ). BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) a "Buy" — based on 58 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.

(BJ) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 8x. On forward P/E, BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. wins at 2. 73x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation's 3. 30x.

Over the past 5 years, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) delivered a total return of +182.

6%, compared to +106. 7% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +631. 6% versus BJ's +328. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.

(BJ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 37β versus Costco Wholesale Corporation's 0. 13β — meaning COST is approximately -135% more volatile than BJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 119% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is pulling ahead at 8.

2% versus 4. 7% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Costco Wholesale Corporation grew EPS 10. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 5% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COST leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

9% net margin versus 2. 7% for BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BJ leads at 3. 9% versus 3. 8% for COST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BJ leads at 18. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 73x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation's 3. 30x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 49. 7x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 28. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BJ: 11. 0% to $104. 67.

In this comparison, COST (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. BJ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.

(BJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 37), +328. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BJ: +328. 7%, COST: +631. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.