Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BJDX
Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$334K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LFMD
LifeMD, Inc.

Medical - Pharmaceuticals

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$215M
5Y Perf.+10.3%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+291.8%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+140.3%

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BJDX logoBJDX
LFMD logoLFMD
HIMS logoHIMS
NTRA logoNTRA
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - PharmaceuticalsMedical - Equipment & ServicesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$334K$215M$6.63B$31.16B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$219M$2.35B$2.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-17M$128M$-208M
Gross Margin86.7%69.7%64.8%
Operating Margin-5.9%4.6%-13.4%
Forward P/E51.5x
Total Debt$222K$6M$1.12B$214M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$37M$229M$1.08B

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BJDX
LFMD
HIMS
NTRA
StockNov 21May 26Return
Bluejay Diagnostics… (BJDX)1000.0-100.0%
LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD)100110.3+10.3%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100391.8+291.8%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100240.3+140.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIMS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. LifeMD, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. BJDX and NTRA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BJDX
Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.
The Income Pick

BJDX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.89
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 6.05x
  • Beta 0.89, current ratio 6.05x
  • Beta 0.89 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LFMD
LifeMD, Inc.
The Value Play

LFMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 1.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and dividends
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs LFMD's -8.7%
  • 5.5% margin vs BJDX's -10.2%
  • 6.0% ROA vs BJDX's -140.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -399.9%
Best for: growth exposure
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • +37.3% vs BJDX's -73.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs LFMD's -8.7%
ValueLFMD logoLFMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIMS logoHIMS5.5% margin vs BJDX's -10.2%
Stability / SafetyBJDX logoBJDXBeta 0.89 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsLFMD logoLFMD1.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NTRA logoNTRA+37.3% vs BJDX's -73.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS6.0% ROA vs BJDX's -140.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -399.9%

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BJDXBluejay Diagnostics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LFMDLifeMD, Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Services
100.0%$13M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBJDXLAGGINGNTRA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — LFMD and HIMS and NTRA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

HIMS and BJDX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRA's -9.0%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$219M$2.3B$2.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$5M$164M-$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$17M$128M-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$15M$73M$97M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+86.7%+69.7%+64.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.9%+4.6%-13.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.8%+5.5%-9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.8%+3.1%+4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-23.6%+28.4%+39.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.1%-16.0%-27.3%+185.4%
Evenly matched — LFMD and HIMS and NTRA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LFMD leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$333,773$215M$6.6B$31.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$185M$7.5B$30.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x-19.52x50.32x-144.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.51.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple42.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.11x2.82x13.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x8.75x12.25x17.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.61x89.61x285.53x
LFMD leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-186 for BJDX. BJDX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFMD scores 5/9 vs BJDX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-185.5%-162.4%+23.7%-15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-140.1%-24.3%+6.0%-10.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.0%+10.7%-36.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-160.3%-37.4%+10.9%-18.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.27x2.07x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$30M$892M-$862M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$37M$229M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$222,249$6M$1.1B$214M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5972.19x-6.48x-25.21x
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BJDX. Over the past 12 months, NTRA leads with a +37.3% total return vs BJDX's -73.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs BJDX's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.5%+28.7%-23.2%-3.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-73.5%-43.9%-51.0%+37.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+178.9%+116.6%+314.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-45.8%+137.6%+115.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+220.7%+161.9%+2089.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-94.4%+40.8%+29.4%+60.6%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BJDX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BJDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTRA currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs BJDX's 10.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x2.12x2.40x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.68$15.84$70.43$256.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.78$2.56$13.74$131.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.9%+28.3%+36.4%+85.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.870.854.557.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded26K1.3M34.9M1.3M
Evenly matched — BJDX and NTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BJDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LFMD as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", NTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.3% upside for LFMD (target: $9) vs 15.6% for HIMS (target: $30). LFMD is the only dividend payer here at 1.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBJDX logoBJDXBluejay Diagnosti…LFMD logoLFMDLifeMD, Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.50$29.67$262.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts101927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.4%0.0%
BJDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LFMD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HIMS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallBluejay Diagnostics, Inc. (BJDX)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BJDX vs LFMD vs HIMS vs NTRA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 7% for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (51. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc. (BJDX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus BJDX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.

(BJDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 169% more volatile than BJDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc. (BJDX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -8. 7% for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeMD, Inc. grew EPS 56. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA?

Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -9. 0% for Natera, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -13. 4% for NTRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFMD leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LFMD: 89.

3% to $8. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA?

In this comparison, LFMD (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. BJDX, HIMS, NTRA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is BJDX or LFMD or HIMS or NTRA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bluejay Diagnostics, Inc.

(BJDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89)). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BJDX: -100. 0%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BJDX and LFMD and HIMS and NTRA?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BJDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LFMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LFMD pays a dividend while BJDX, HIMS, NTRA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BJDX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $20B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LFMD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.