Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.72B
5Y Perf.+287.4%
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.60B
5Y Perf.+583.0%
AEO
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+84.6%
CATO
The Cato Corporation

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-70.3%
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$408M
5Y Perf.+2.5%

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BKE logoBKE
ANF logoANF
AEO logoAEO
CATO logoCATO
ZUMZ logoZUMZ
IndustryApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - Retail
Market Cap$2.72B$3.60B$2.83B$53M$408M
Revenue (TTM)$1.28B$5.27B$5.50B$660M$929M
Net Income (TTM)$206M$507M$192M$-10M$13M
Gross Margin48.9%58.6%33.0%32.2%35.8%
Operating Margin20.1%13.4%6.0%-2.4%1.8%
Forward P/E13.4x8.1x12.3x31.2x
Total Debt$326M$1.17B$1.73B$146M$199M
Cash & Equiv.$267M$760M$239M$20M$128M

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BKE
ANF
AEO
CATO
ZUMZ
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Buckle, Inc. (BKE)100387.4+287.4%
Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF)100683.0+583.0%
American Eagle Outf… (AEO)100184.6+84.6%
The Cato Corporation (CATO)10029.7-70.3%
Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ)100102.5+2.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BKE and ANF are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CATO and ZUMZ also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BKE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 7.3%, current ratio 2.05x
  • 16.1% margin vs CATO's -1.5%
  • 20.6% ROA vs CATO's -2.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
The Growth Play

ANF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
  • 228.9% 10Y total return vs BKE's 221.3%
  • 6.4% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AEO
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, AEO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CATO
The Cato Corporation
The Income Pick

CATO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 18.5%
  • Beta 0.88 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage
  • 18.5% yield, vs BKE's 7.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ZUMZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +100.3% vs ANF's +13.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANF logoANF6.4% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
ValueANF logoANFBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBKE logoBKE16.1% margin vs CATO's -1.5%
Stability / SafetyCATO logoCATOBeta 0.88 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage
DividendsCATO logoCATO18.5% yield, vs BKE's 7.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ZUMZ logoZUMZ+100.3% vs ANF's +13.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BKE logoBKE20.6% ROA vs CATO's -2.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.7%

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BKEThe Buckle, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.2B
ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co.
FY 2024
Abercrombie
51.7%$2.6B
Hollister
48.3%$2.4B
AEOAmerican Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
FY 2024
American Eagle Brand
63.5%$3.4B
Aerie Brand
32.6%$1.7B
Corporate, Non-Segment
4.6%$244M
Intersegment Eliminations
-0.7%$-38,900,000
CATOThe Cato Corporation
FY 2024
Credit Card
100.0%$22M
ZUMZZumiez Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBKELAGGINGZUMZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 8.3x CATO's $660M. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CATO's -1.5%. On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$5.3B$5.5B$660M$929M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$282M$862M$546M-$5M$44M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$206M$507M$192M-$10M$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$215M$378M$25M-$7M$51M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.9%+58.6%+33.0%+32.2%+35.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.1%+13.4%+6.0%-2.4%+1.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.1%+9.6%+3.5%-1.5%+1.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.8%+7.2%+0.5%-1.1%+5.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+5.4%+9.7%+6.3%+4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.1%+3.1%-7.4%+64.6%+38.5%
BKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CATO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 76% valuation discount to ZUMZ's 30.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZUMZ's 28.1x.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$3.6B$2.8B$53M$408M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$4.0B$4.3B$179M$479M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.78x7.51x15.29x-3.04x30.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.41x8.07x12.26x31.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.56x4.68x8.00x28.12x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.24x0.68x0.51x0.08x0.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.36x2.68x1.74x0.35x1.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.63x9.52x7.51x
CATO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CATO. ZUMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZUMZ scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+44.4%+38.5%+12.1%-5.8%+4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+20.6%+15.1%+4.8%-2.2%+2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+38.4%+31.4%+8.1%-6.7%+3.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+35.3%+30.5%+10.7%-9.6%+5.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945227
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x0.82x1.02x0.90x0.61x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$59M$409M$1.5B$126M$71M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$267M$760M$239M$20M$128M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$326M$1.2B$1.7B$146M$199M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense302.38x75.18x-1.77x
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $20,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,983 for CATO. Over the past 12 months, ZUMZ leads with a +100.3% total return vs ANF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 51.2% vs CATO's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.4%-36.5%-35.8%-1.7%-7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+62.7%+13.1%+54.5%+27.7%+100.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.0%+245.6%+36.5%-52.3%+45.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.3%+101.3%-46.7%-60.2%-46.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+221.3%+228.9%+48.9%-71.0%+65.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.9%+51.2%+10.9%-21.9%+13.4%
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BKE and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x1.42x2.08x0.88x1.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$61.69$133.11$28.46$4.92$31.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$34.95$65.45$9.27$2.20$11.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.9%+59.0%+58.6%+60.0%+75.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.531.435.256.640.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded393K1.2M5.2M61K152K
Evenly matched — BKE and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AEO and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BKE as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", AEO as "Hold", ZUMZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.8% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs -18.8% for ZUMZ (target: $20). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.52% vs BKE's 7.34%.

MetricBKE logoBKEThe Buckle, Inc.ANF logoANFAbercrombie & Fit…AEO logoAEOAmerican Eagle Ou…CATO logoCATOThe Cato Corporat…ZUMZ logoZUMZZumiez Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$53.00$120.80$24.83$19.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts20555233
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.3%+18.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0020
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.94$0.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+12.5%0.0%+7.3%+9.4%
Evenly matched — AEO and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CATO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Buckle, Inc. (BKE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Zumiez Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -60. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +237. 6% versus CATO's -71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

88β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning AEO is approximately 135% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zumiez Inc. grew EPS 961. 9% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

The Buckle, Inc.

(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -2. 9% for The Cato Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus -4. 2% for CATO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

(ANF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for Zumiez Inc. — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 53. 8% to $120. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?

In this comparison, CATO (18.

5% yield), BKE (7. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ANF, AEO, ZUMZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.

(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 3% yield, +237. 6% 10Y return). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +237. 6%, AEO: +48. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BKE and ANF and AEO and CATO and ZUMZ?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ZUMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BKE, CATO pay a dividend while ANF, AEO, ZUMZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BKE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CATO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZUMZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BKE and ANF and AEO and CATO and ZUMZ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BKE: 9.3% · ANF: 5.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(BKE: 16.1% · ANF: 9.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BKE: 13.8x · ANF: 7.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.