Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $3.60B | $2.83B | $53M | $408M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $5.27B | $5.50B | $660M | $929M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $507M | $192M | $-10M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 58.6% | 33.0% | 32.2% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 13.4% | 6.0% | -2.4% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 8.1x | 12.3x | — | 31.2x |
| Total Debt | $326M | $1.17B | $1.73B | $146M | $199M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $760M | $239M | $20M | $128M |
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 387.4 | +287.4% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 683.0 | +583.0% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 184.6 | +84.6% |
| The Cato Corporation (CATO) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) | 100 | 102.5 | +2.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
- Beta 0.89, yield 7.3%, current ratio 2.05x
- 16.1% margin vs CATO's -1.5%
- 20.6% ROA vs CATO's -2.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.7%
ANF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 228.9% 10Y total return vs BKE's 221.3%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2%
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, AEO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CATO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 18.5%
- Beta 0.88 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage
- 18.5% yield, vs BKE's 7.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ZUMZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.3% vs ANF's +13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs CATO's -8.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs CATO's -1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.5% yield, vs BKE's 7.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.3% vs ANF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs CATO's -2.2%, ROIC 38.4% vs -6.7% |
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
CATO leads 1 • ANF leads 1 • AEO leads 0 • ZUMZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 8.3x CATO's $660M. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CATO's -1.5%. On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $5.3B | $5.5B | $660M | $929M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $282M | $862M | $546M | -$5M | $44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | $507M | $192M | -$10M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $378M | $25M | -$7M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | +58.6% | +33.0% | +32.2% | +35.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +13.4% | +6.0% | -2.4% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +9.6% | +3.5% | -1.5% | +1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +7.2% | +0.5% | -1.1% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +5.4% | +9.7% | +6.3% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +3.1% | -7.4% | +64.6% | +38.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CATO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 76% valuation discount to ZUMZ's 30.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZUMZ's 28.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $3.6B | $2.8B | $53M | $408M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $4.0B | $4.3B | $179M | $479M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.78x | 7.51x | 15.29x | -3.04x | 30.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.41x | 8.07x | 12.26x | — | 31.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.56x | 4.68x | 8.00x | — | 28.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.24x | 0.68x | 0.51x | 0.08x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 2.68x | 1.74x | 0.35x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.63x | 9.52x | — | — | 7.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CATO. ZUMZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZUMZ scores 7/9 vs CATO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.4% | +38.5% | +12.1% | -5.8% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | +15.1% | +4.8% | -2.2% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | +31.4% | +8.1% | -6.7% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | +30.5% | +10.7% | -9.6% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.90x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $59M | $409M | $1.5B | $126M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $760M | $239M | $20M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $326M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $146M | $199M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 302.38x | 75.18x | -1.77x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $20,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,983 for CATO. Over the past 12 months, ZUMZ leads with a +100.3% total return vs ANF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 51.2% vs CATO's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | -36.5% | -35.8% | -1.7% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.7% | +13.1% | +54.5% | +27.7% | +100.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.0% | +245.6% | +36.5% | -52.3% | +45.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.3% | +101.3% | -46.7% | -60.2% | -46.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.3% | +228.9% | +48.9% | -71.0% | +65.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.9% | +51.2% | +10.9% | -21.9% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKE and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CATO is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.42x | 2.08x | 0.88x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.69 | $133.11 | $28.46 | $4.92 | $31.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.95 | $65.45 | $9.27 | $2.20 | $11.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +59.0% | +58.6% | +60.0% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 31.4 | 35.2 | 56.6 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 1.2M | 5.2M | 61K | 152K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEO and CATO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKE as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", AEO as "Hold", ZUMZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.8% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs -18.8% for ZUMZ (target: $20). For income investors, CATO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.52% vs BKE's 7.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $120.80 | $24.83 | — | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 55 | 52 | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | — | — | +18.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.94 | — | — | $0.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.5% | 0.0% | +7.3% | +9.4% |
BKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CATO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BKE vs ANF vs AEO vs CATO vs ZUMZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Zumiez Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -60. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +237. 6% versus CATO's -71. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Cato Corporation (CATO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning AEO is approximately 135% more volatile than CATO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -8. 2% for The Cato Corporation (CATO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zumiez Inc. grew EPS 961. 9% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -2. 9% for The Cato Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus -4. 2% for CATO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for Zumiez Inc. — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 53. 8% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ?
In this comparison, CATO (18.
5% yield), BKE (7. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ANF, AEO, ZUMZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKE or ANF or AEO or CATO or ZUMZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 3% yield, +237. 6% 10Y return). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +237. 6%, AEO: +48. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKE and ANF and AEO and CATO and ZUMZ?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BKE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CATO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ZUMZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BKE, CATO pay a dividend while ANF, AEO, ZUMZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.