Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BKH vs NWE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Diversified Utilities
BKH vs NWE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Diversified Utilities |
| Market Cap | $5.62B | $4.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.31B | $1.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $292M | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 18.9x |
| Total Debt | $4.70B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $9M |
BKH vs NWE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Hills Corpora… (BKH) | 100 | 119.6 | +19.6% |
| Northwestern Energy… (NWE) | 100 | 118.2 | +18.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKH vs NWE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth 1.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.21, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.35x
NWE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 3.7%
- 63.9% 10Y total return vs BKH's 57.1%
- 3.7% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs BKH's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs NWE's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.0x vs 18.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs NWE's 10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs NWE's 0.24 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs BKH's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.0% vs BKH's +24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs NWE's 2.0%, ROIC 4.9% vs 4.0% |
BKH vs NWE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BKH vs NWE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKH and NWE operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $1.6B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.6% (BKH) to 10.2% (NWE).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $820M | $569M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $292M | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$146M | -$148M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +6.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.5% | -17.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BKH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.6x trailing earnings, BKH trades at a 23% valuation discount to NWE's 24.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKH's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWE's 13.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.55x | 24.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.96x | 18.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.34x | 13.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKH delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for NWE. NWE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BKH's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKH scores 7/9 vs NWE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.63x | 2.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NWE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKH five years ago would be worth $12,642 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,256 for NWE. Over the past 12 months, NWE leads with a +27.0% total return vs BKH's +24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NWE at 9.8% vs BKH's 7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | +27.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.7% | +32.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.4% | +22.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.1% | +63.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKH and NWE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKH is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWE's 0.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.69 | $75.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.49 | $50.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 879K | 459K |
Analyst Outlook
NWE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKH as "Hold" and NWE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for BKH (target: $86) vs -6.7% for NWE (target: $66). For income investors, NWE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.70% vs BKH's 3.66%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $86.00 | $66.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.70 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BKH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NWE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BKH vs NWE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKH or NWE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE). Black Hills Corporation (BKH) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Hills Corporation (BKH) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKH or NWE?
On trailing P/E, Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is the cheapest at 18.
6x versus Northwestern Energy Group Inc at 24. 2x. On forward P/E, Black Hills Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKH or NWE?
Over the past 5 years, Black Hills Corporation (BKH) delivered a total return of +26.
4%, compared to +22. 6% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWE returned +63. 9% versus BKH's +57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKH or NWE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Northwestern Energy Group Inc's 0. 24β — meaning NWE is approximately 15% more volatile than BKH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 120% for Black Hills Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKH or NWE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus 6. 4% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Hills Corporation grew EPS 1. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 5% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NWE leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKH or NWE?
Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
6% net margin versus 11. 2% for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKH leads at 23. 3% versus 20. 2% for NWE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWE leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKH or NWE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Black Hills Corporation (BKH) trades at 17.
0x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Northwestern Energy Group Inc — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKH: 16. 5% to $86. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKH or NWE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwestern Energy Group Inc (NWE) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 3. 7% for Black Hills Corporation (BKH).
09Is BKH or NWE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Black Hills Corporation (BKH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 3. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKH: +57. 1%, NWE: +63. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKH and NWE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.