Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Telecommunications Services
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $351M | $21M | $10M | $90M | $1.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $19M | $72M | $51M | $41.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $3M | $-24M | $-15M | $-1.50B |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 51.0% | 15.1% | 43.2% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 10.7% | -27.4% | -22.1% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 7.8x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $929K | $3M | $21M | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $8M | $22M | $8M | $5.00B |
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BK Technologies Cor… (BKTI) | 100 | 552.5 | +452.5% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 336.1% 10Y total return vs SIFY's 141.0%
- 15.7% margin vs GFAI's -32.9%
- 21.9% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 50.5% vs -41.6%
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GNSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 69.8% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
SIFY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +264.2% vs GFAI's -53.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs GFAI's -32.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs GFAI's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +264.2% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 50.5% vs -41.6% |
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKTI leads in 3 of 6 categories
MNDO leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • GNSS leads 0 • SIFY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 2130.1x MNDO's $19M. BKTI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFAI's -32.9%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $19M | $72M | $51M | $41.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $2M | -$12M | -$9M | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $3M | -$24M | -$15M | -$1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $4M | -$6M | -$3M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +51.0% | +15.1% | +43.2% | +34.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +10.7% | -27.4% | -22.1% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +13.4% | -32.9% | -29.2% | -3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +20.9% | -8.8% | -5.3% | -9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -6.0% | +3.6% | +145.9% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | -23.4% | +38.9% | +78.0% | -3.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNDO and GFAI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 72% valuation discount to BKTI's 27.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKTI's 20.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $351M | $21M | $10M | $90M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $329M | $13M | -$9M | $104M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.30x | 7.77x | -0.89x | -5.00x | -119.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.46x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.61x | 5.68x | — | — | 18.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 1.06x | 0.28x | 2.22x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.27x | 0.90x | 0.16x | 41.58x | 4.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.06x | 5.20x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI delivers a 35.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. BKTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKTI scores 7/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.0% | +11.9% | -69.7% | -8.2% | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.9% | +8.6% | -50.2% | -22.0% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +50.5% | +8.6% | -41.6% | -56.7% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.7% | +7.8% | -19.1% | -68.2% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.04x | 0.08x | 9.85x | 1.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$7M | -$19M | $13M | $34.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $8M | $22M | $8M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $929,000 | $3M | $21M | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 60.33x | — | -167.24x | -31.66x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKTI five years ago would be worth $41,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKTI at 91.4% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.9% | -13.7% | -26.3% | -8.3% | +29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.5% | -34.8% | -53.2% | +2.6% | +264.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +600.9% | -24.2% | -93.8% | -31.3% | +113.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.9% | -35.0% | -99.5% | -66.7% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.1% | +66.7% | -99.5% | +14.9% | +141.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +91.4% | -8.8% | -60.4% | -11.8% | +28.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKTI and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFAI's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKTI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.07x | 2.31x | 0.87x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.42 | $1.64 | $1.50 | $2.70 | $17.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.17 | $0.98 | $0.38 | $1.40 | $4.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +61.6% | +31.5% | +74.1% | +89.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 27.4 | 47.0 | 59.9 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 37K | 378K | 95K | 56K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BKTI and MNDO and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKTI as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy". MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 21.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +21.6% | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.22 | — | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BKTI leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
BKTI vs MNDO vs GFAI vs GNSS vs SIFY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus BK Technologies Corporation at 27. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
Over the past 5 years, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) delivered a total return of +310.
9%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKTI returned +336. 1% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Guardforce AI Co. , Limited's 2. 31β — meaning GFAI is approximately 3249% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKTI leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKTI leads at 18. 6% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDO leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BKTI, GFAI, GNSS, SIFY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BKTI or MNDO or GFAI or GNSS or SIFY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BKTI and MNDO and GFAI and GNSS and SIFY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BKTI (Technology) and MNDO (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BKTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO pays a dividend while BKTI, GFAI, GNSS, SIFY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.