Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BL vs APPF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
BL vs APPF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.76B | $6.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $717M | $995M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $152M |
| Gross Margin | 75.3% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $940M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $390M | $107M |
BL vs APPF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine, Inc. (BL) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BL vs APPF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 24.6x)
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs BL's 24.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs BL's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 24.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs BL's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs BL's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.6% vs BL's -36.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs BL's 1.6%, ROIC 22.4% vs 3.5% |
BL vs APPF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BL vs APPF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPF and BL operate at a comparable scale, with $995M and $717M in trailing revenue. APPF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BL's 3.7%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $717M | $995M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $192M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.3% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.2% | +37.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.1x trailing earnings, APPF trades at a 43% valuation discount to BL's 75.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BL's 28.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APPF's 34.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 75.68x | 43.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.27x | 24.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.88x | 34.06x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.51x | 6.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.69x | 11.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.89x | 25.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $7 for BL. APPF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BL's 2.53x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +24.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.53x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $550M | -$36M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $390M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $940M | $71M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $12,779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,847 for BL. Over the past 12 months, APPF leads with a -21.6% total return vs BL's -36.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 6.6% vs BL's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | -27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.7% | -21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.1% | +21.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.5% | +1247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
APPF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
APPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BL's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.57 | $326.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.78 | $142.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.5% | +51.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 350K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BL as "Hold" and APPF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.9% upside for BL (target: $46) vs 41.6% for APPF (target: $237).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $236.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +3.1% |
APPF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BL vs APPF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BL or APPF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for BlackLine, Inc. (BL). AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) offers the better valuation at 43. 1x trailing P/E (24. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BL or APPF?
On trailing P/E, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the cheapest at 43. 1x versus BlackLine, Inc. at 75. 7x. On forward P/E, BlackLine, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BL or APPF?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -71. 5% for BlackLine, Inc. (BL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1247% versus BL's +24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BL or APPF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus BlackLine, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning BL is approximately 31% more volatile than APPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for BlackLine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BL or APPF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 7. 2% for BlackLine, Inc. (BL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AppFolio, Inc. grew EPS -30. 1% year-over-year, compared to -73. 1% for BlackLine, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BL or APPF?
AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus 3. 5% for BlackLine, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPF leads at 16. 1% versus 4. 8% for BL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BL leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BL or APPF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BlackLine, Inc.
(BL) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for AppFolio, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BL: 55. 9% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BL or APPF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BL or APPF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1247% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1247%, BL: +24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BL and APPF?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.