Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Residential Construction
Construction
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Residential Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.05B | $4.56B | $1.63B | $5.84B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.62B | $1.05B | $533M | $2.95B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $503M | $418M | $122M | $255M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 78.3% | 75.9% | 33.9% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 49.4% | 31.7% | 12.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 10.9x | 12.0x | 19.5x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.15B | $705M | $80M | $1.05B | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $536M | $157M | $322M | $182M |
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TopBuild Corp. (BLD) | 100 | 373.2 | +273.2% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs IBP's 6.5%
- +50.2% vs BLDR's -25.0%
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs BLDR's 1.78
- Beta 0.83, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.04x
- NIM 4.0% vs TCBK's 3.6%
TCBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth 1.8%, EPS growth 6.9%
- 1.8% NII/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- 2.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 12.2% ROA vs TCBK's 1.2%, ROIC 20.7% vs 8.9%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.8% NII/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.53 vs 1.78 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.1% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.2% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs TCBK's 1.2%, ROIC 20.7% vs 8.9% |
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories
IBP leads 1 • BLD leads 1 • TCBK leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 27.8x TCBK's $533M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, BLD holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $1.1B | $533M | $2.9B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $981M | $417M | $183M | $656M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $503M | $418M | $122M | $255M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $704M | $360M | $124M | $63M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +78.3% | +75.9% | +33.9% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +49.4% | +31.7% | +12.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +39.1% | +22.8% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +47.0% | +24.0% | +2.1% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | — | — | -3.5% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | -100.0% | +17.0% | -21.3% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 53% valuation discount to BLD's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs BLDR's 2.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $4.6B | $1.6B | $5.8B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.0B | $4.7B | $1.6B | $6.6B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.43x | 11.07x | 13.70x | 22.33x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.52x | 10.87x | 12.05x | 19.50x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | 0.54x | 1.20x | 0.92x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.62x | 8.69x | 8.52x | 13.41x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 4.32x | 3.06x | 1.97x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.20x | 1.40x | 1.25x | 8.26x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.29x | 9.21x | 12.77x | 19.41x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs BLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.1% | +13.2% | +9.4% | +37.5% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +3.4% | +1.2% | +12.2% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +10.5% | +8.9% | +20.7% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.1% | +5.4% | +10.8% | +22.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 0.22x | 0.06x | 1.48x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $168M | -$77M | $731M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $536M | $157M | $322M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $705M | $80M | $1.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | 1.91x | 1.41x | 9.47x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLD five years ago would be worth $19,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,159 for TCBK. Over the past 12 months, BLD leads with a +50.2% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLD at 25.9% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | +10.7% | +8.5% | -18.1% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +20.1% | +33.5% | +34.0% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.7% | +88.6% | +78.3% | +98.3% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.2% | +61.3% | +21.6% | +80.6% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1219.2% | +229.3% | +129.4% | +650.1% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +23.5% | +21.3% | +25.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
IBOC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBOC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.83x | 0.93x | 1.19x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $559.47 | $75.44 | $53.18 | $349.00 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $273.87 | $61.15 | $36.32 | $150.83 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +97.1% | +95.6% | +62.1% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 59.5 | 57.2 | 55.0 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 629K | 373K | 142K | 344K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBOC and TCBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLD as "Buy", IBOC as "Buy", TCBK as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 12.8% for TCBK (target: $57). For income investors, TCBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs IBP's 1.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $537.80 | $85.00 | $57.33 | $293.00 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 1 | 12 | 27 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +2.7% | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.40 | $1.38 | $3.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.1% | +2.0% | +3.0% | +4.7% |
IBOC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IBP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BLD vs IBOC vs TCBK vs IBP vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the stronger pick with 1.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TopBuild Corp. (BLD) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus TopBuild Corp. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, International Bancshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, TopBuild Corp.
(BLD) delivered a total return of +91. 2%, compared to +21. 6% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLD returned +1219% versus TCBK's +129. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 100% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is pulling ahead at 1.
8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriCo Bancshares grew EPS 6. 9% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBP leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for TopBuild Corp. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR?
In this comparison, TCBK (2.
7% yield), IBOC (1. 9% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BLD, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLD or IBOC or TCBK or IBP or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLD and IBOC and TCBK and IBP and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLD (Industrials) and IBOC (Financial Services) and TCBK (Financial Services) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IBOC, TCBK, IBP pay a dividend while BLD, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.