Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Construction
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Residential Construction | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Construction |
| Market Cap | $8.79B | $5.84B | $5.54B | $48.02B | $14.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.82B | $2.95B | $4.71B | $31.63B | $7.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $292M | $255M | $153M | $2.07B | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 33.9% | 34.9% | 30.7% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 12.7% | 5.1% | 9.2% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 19.5x | 28.7x | 22.1x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $1.05B | $980M | $5.97B | $3.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $182M | $322M | $191M | $674M | $647M |
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Ferguson plc (FERG) | 100 | 311.3 | +211.3% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.78 vs 3.40
IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs FERG's 373.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, current ratio 3.03x
- PEG 0.80 vs SITE's 6.91
- Beta 1.19, yield 1.5%, current ratio 3.03x
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
FERG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- +48.6% vs BLDR's -25.0%
MAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 1.7%
- 10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.78 vs 3.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs BLDR's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IBP's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 35.4% vs 6.4% |
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • IBP leads 1 • SITE leads 0 • FERG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.7x IBP's $2.9B. MAS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, MAS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.8B | $2.9B | $4.7B | $31.6B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $656M | $382M | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $292M | $255M | $153M | $2.1B | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $862M | $63M | $246M | $1.0B | $943M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +33.9% | +34.9% | +30.7% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +12.7% | +5.1% | +9.2% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +8.6% | +3.2% | +6.6% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +2.1% | +5.2% | +3.2% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.1% | -3.5% | +0.1% | -2.0% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -151.2% | -21.3% | +1.6% | +2.9% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.6x trailing earnings, MAS trades at a 50% valuation discount to SITE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.8B | $5.8B | $5.5B | $48.0B | $14.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.3B | $6.6B | $6.3B | $53.3B | $17.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.43x | 22.33x | 37.08x | 26.45x | 18.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.07x | 19.50x | 28.67x | 22.12x | 16.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.59x | 0.92x | 8.94x | 1.55x | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.35x | 13.41x | 16.70x | 17.90x | 12.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 1.97x | 1.18x | 1.56x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 8.26x | 3.35x | 8.42x | 201.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.30x | 19.41x | 22.44x | 29.96x | 16.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. SITE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | +37.5% | +9.1% | +35.1% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +12.2% | +4.6% | +11.8% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +20.7% | +7.3% | +18.0% | +35.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +22.6% | +9.6% | +22.6% | +35.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 1.48x | 0.58x | 1.02x | 45.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.5B | $731M | $789M | $5.3B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $182M | $322M | $191M | $674M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $1.1B | $980M | $6.0B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 9.47x | 6.79x | 15.59x | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FERG five years ago would be worth $19,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,157 for SITE. Over the past 12 months, FERG leads with a +48.6% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.0% | -18.1% | -0.1% | +10.4% | +12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.0% | +34.0% | +5.6% | +48.6% | +21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | +98.3% | -18.7% | +82.0% | +40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.8% | +80.6% | -38.4% | +97.7% | +16.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +614.8% | +650.1% | +368.6% | +373.2% | +152.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.2% | +25.6% | -6.7% | +22.1% | +11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBP and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBP is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.19x | 1.24x | 1.24x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.03 | $349.00 | $168.56 | $271.64 | $79.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.40 | $150.83 | $112.23 | $166.04 | $58.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.6% | +62.1% | +74.1% | +90.8% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 55.0 | 36.8 | 48.1 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 344K | 689K | 1.3M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
MAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", SITE as "Buy", FERG as "Buy", MAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 9.9% for FERG (target: $271). For income investors, MAS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.73% vs FERG's 1.00%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.92 | $293.00 | $162.29 | $271.00 | $82.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 27 | 15 | 14 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | — | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.24 | — | $2.45 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +3.0% | +1.8% | +2.0% | +3.9% |
MAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BLDR vs IBP vs SITE vs FERG vs MAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Masco Corporation (MAS) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
On trailing P/E, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the cheapest at 18.
6x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
Over the past 5 years, Ferguson plc (FERG) delivered a total return of +97.
7%, compared to -38. 4% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus MAS's +152. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 39% more volatile than IBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
7% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAS leads at 35. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS?
In this comparison, MAS (1.
7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR, SITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLDR or IBP or SITE or FERG or MAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 5% yield, +650. 1% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +650. 1%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLDR and IBP and SITE and FERG and MAS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and SITE (Industrials) and FERG (Industrials) and MAS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IBP, FERG, MAS pay a dividend while BLDR, SITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.