Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLSH vs CME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
BLSH vs CME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $6.68B | $104.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $244.91B | $6.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-765M | $4.24B |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 86.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | 64.9% |
| Forward P/E | 66.1x | 23.5x |
| Total Debt | $601M | $3.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $4.42B |
Quick Verdict: BLSH vs CME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, BLSH is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
CME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta -0.30, yield 3.8%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 15.4%
- 291.2% 10Y total return vs BLSH's -34.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs BLSH's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.5x vs 66.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 62.0% margin vs BLSH's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (13.1% vs 18.2%) | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.9% vs BLSH's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs BLSH's -19.3%, ROIC 10.2% vs -2.3% |
BLSH vs CME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLSH vs CME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CME leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $244.9B annually — 37.6x CME's $6.5B. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLSH's -0.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $244.9B | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$765M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +86.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +64.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +62.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +64.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BLSH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.7B | $104.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $103.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.40x | 25.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 66.05x | 23.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 16.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 3.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CME leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CME delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BLSH. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLSH's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CME scores 5/9 vs BLSH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.2% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.3% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $497M | -$666M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $4.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $601M | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.02x | 41.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CME leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CME five years ago would be worth $16,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,516 for BLSH. Over the past 12 months, CME leads with a +5.9% total return vs BLSH's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CME at 19.9% vs BLSH's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | +5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | +72.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | +64.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | +291.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.3% | +19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLSH's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CME currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs BLSH's 37.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.64x | -0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.00 | $329.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.79 | $257.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.6% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BLSH as "Buy" and CME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.8% upside for BLSH (target: $50) vs 11.1% for CME (target: $320). CME is the only dividend payer here at 3.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $320.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $10.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
CME leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BLSH vs CME: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLSH or CME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Bullish (BLSH). CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (23. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bullish (BLSH) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLSH or CME?
On forward P/E, CME Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 23. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLSH or CME?
Over the past 5 years, CME Group Inc.
(CME) delivered a total return of +64. 1%, compared to -34. 8% for Bullish (BLSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +284. 9% versus BLSH's -39. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLSH or CME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus Bullish's 2. 64β — meaning BLSH is approximately -969% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 18% for Bullish — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLSH or CME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CME Group Inc.
(CME) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -2. 2% for Bullish (BLSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CME Group Inc. grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1209. 3% for Bullish. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLSH or CME?
CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus -0. 3% for Bullish — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus -0. 0% for BLSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLSH or CME more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CME Group Inc.
(CME) trades at 23. 5x forward P/E versus 66. 1x for Bullish — 42. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLSH: 12. 8% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLSH or CME?
In this comparison, CME (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BLSH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLSH or CME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30), 3. 8% yield, +284. 9% 10Y return). Bullish (BLSH) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +284. 9%, BLSH: -39. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLSH and CME?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLSH (Technology) and CME (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLSH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CME pays a dividend while BLSH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.