Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLX vs SUPV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BLX vs SUPV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.05B | $765M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $2.33T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $227M | $-48.45B |
| Gross Margin | 93.5% | 39.5% |
| Operating Margin | 66.8% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.18B | $1.05T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.92B | $1.60T |
BLX vs SUPV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banco Latinoamerica… (BLX) | 100 | 465.6 | +365.6% |
| Grupo Supervielle S… (SUPV) | 100 | 443.7 | +343.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLX vs SUPV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 4.5%
- 204.0% 10Y total return vs SUPV's -17.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 14.75x
SUPV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth -145.9%
- NIM 12.1% vs BLX's 2.1%
- 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BLX's -58.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BLX's -58.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 8.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SUPV's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SUPV's 2.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SUPV's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs SUPV's -38.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SUPV's 0.4% |
BLX vs SUPV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUPV is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.33T annually — 6846.7x BLX's $340M. BLX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPV's -2.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $2.33T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $230M | -$73.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $227M | -$48.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | -$725.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.5% | +39.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +109.2% | -48.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -157.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SUPV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $765M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $371M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.99x | -18.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.68x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.96x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.02x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 1.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.52x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLX delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SUPV. SUPV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLX's 2.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLX scores 7/9 vs SUPV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.49x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | -$549.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $1.60T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $1.05T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.46x | -0.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BLX and SUPV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SUPV five years ago would be worth $52,009 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $41,787 for BLX. Over the past 12 months, BLX leads with a +50.9% total return vs SUPV's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPV at 58.7% vs BLX's 52.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.5% | -24.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.9% | -38.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.9% | +299.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +317.9% | +420.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.0% | -17.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.0% | +58.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPV's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLX currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs SUPV's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 2.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.79 | $16.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.41 | $4.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 129K | 841K |
Analyst Outlook
BLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BLX as "Buy" and SUPV as "Sell". For income investors, BLX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.50% vs SUPV's 3.59%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $437.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUPV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BLX vs SUPV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLX or SUPV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 1% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLX or SUPV?
On forward P/E, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLX or SUPV?
Over the past 5 years, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) delivered a total return of +420. 1%, compared to +317. 9% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLX returned +204. 0% versus SUPV's -17. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLX or SUPV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Grupo Supervielle S. A. 's 2. 51β — meaning SUPV is approximately 361% more volatile than BLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 2% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLX or SUPV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -58. 1% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -145. 9% for Grupo Supervielle S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLX or SUPV?
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the more profitable company, earning 66. 8% net margin versus -2. 4% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — meaning it keeps 66. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLX leads at 66. 8% versus -4. 8% for SUPV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLX leads at 93. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLX or SUPV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 7x for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLX or SUPV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 3. 6% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV).
09Is BLX or SUPV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 4. 5% yield, +204. 0% 10Y return). Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLX: +204. 0%, SUPV: -17. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLX and SUPV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLX is a small-cap deep-value stock; SUPV is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.