Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $751M | $5.73B | $3.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $2.33T | $10.63T | $5.20T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $227M | $-48.45B | $915.98B | $258.90B |
| Gross Margin | 93.5% | 39.5% | 62.7% | 65.9% |
| Operating Margin | 66.8% | -4.8% | 20.8% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.18B | $1.05T | $2.16T | $349.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.92B | $1.60T | $3.76T | $2.82T |
BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banco Latinoamerica… (BLX) | 100 | 459.0 | +359.0% |
| Grupo Supervielle S… (SUPV) | 100 | 435.5 | +335.5% |
| Grupo Financiero Ga… (GGAL) | 100 | 539.8 | +439.8% |
| Banco BBVA Argentin… (BBAR) | 100 | 484.5 | +384.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, current ratio 14.75x
- Beta 0.55, yield 4.6%, current ratio 14.75x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BBAR's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
SUPV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BLX's -58.1%
GGAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth -23.5%, EPS growth 119.6%
- 71.6% 10Y total return vs BLX's 202.0%
- PEG 0.00 vs BLX's 0.28
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.00
BBAR is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 20.3% vs BLX's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BLX's -58.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.00 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BBAR's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SUPV's 2.51 | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield, vs BLX's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.2% vs SUPV's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BBAR's 0.6% |
BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
GGAL leads 1 • SUPV leads 0 • BBAR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GGAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.63T annually — 31291.4x BLX's $340M. BLX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPV's -2.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $2.33T | $10.63T | $5.20T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $230M | -$73.4B | $1.35T | $421.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $227M | -$48.4B | $916.0B | $258.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | -$725.2B | $3.62T | -$3.96T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.5% | +39.5% | +62.7% | +65.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | -4.8% | +20.8% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | -2.4% | +15.3% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +109.2% | -48.6% | -27.4% | -102.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -157.4% | -138.6% | -64.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SUPV and GGAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.1x trailing earnings, GGAL trades at a 59% valuation discount to BBAR's 12.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GGAL offers better value at 0.04x vs BLX's 0.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $751M | $5.7B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $356M | $4.6B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.86x | -18.25x | 5.06x | 12.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.56x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.29x | — | 0.04x | 0.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.83x | — | 2.65x | 3.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.94x | 0.45x | 0.75x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.03x | 1.47x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.44x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GGAL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLX delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SUPV. BBAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLX's 2.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLX scores 7/9 vs SUPV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.9% | -5.2% | +12.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | -0.7% | +2.2% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | -5.7% | +31.0% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -2.6% | +19.5% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.49x | 1.04x | 0.36x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | -$549.2B | -$203.1B | -$2.47T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $1.60T | $3.76T | $2.82T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $1.05T | $2.16T | $349.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.46x | -0.11x | 0.71x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BLX and BBAR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBAR five years ago would be worth $63,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40,347 for BLX. Over the past 12 months, BLX leads with a +47.2% total return vs SUPV's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAR at 60.4% vs BLX's 51.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | -25.5% | -18.1% | -13.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.2% | -39.8% | -23.2% | -21.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.5% | +292.6% | +304.2% | +312.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +303.5% | +399.6% | +517.5% | +534.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.0% | -18.9% | +71.6% | -9.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.3% | +57.8% | +59.3% | +60.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPV's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLX currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs SUPV's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 2.51x | 1.73x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.79 | $16.90 | $65.48 | $23.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.41 | $4.54 | $25.89 | $7.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +50.8% | +66.0% | +66.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 46.9 | 46.5 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 129K | 834K | 1.1M | 669K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BLX and SUPV and GGAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLX as "Buy", SUPV as "Sell", GGAL as "Buy", BBAR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.9% upside for GGAL (target: $61) vs -18.4% for SUPV (target: $7). For income investors, GGAL offers the higher dividend yield at 6.91% vs BBAR's 2.08%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $60.50 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +3.7% | +6.9% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $437.61 | $4146.37 | $443.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
BLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GGAL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
BLX vs SUPV vs GGAL vs BBAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 1% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. (GGAL) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
On trailing P/E, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.
A. (GGAL) is the cheapest at 5. 1x versus Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. wins at 0. 00x versus Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. 's 0. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
Over the past 5 years, Banco BBVA Argentina S.
A. (BBAR) delivered a total return of +534. 2%, compared to +303. 5% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLX returned +202. 0% versus SUPV's -18. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus Grupo Supervielle S. A. 's 2. 51β — meaning SUPV is approximately 361% more volatile than BLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Supervielle S.
A. (SUPV) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -58. 1% for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. (BLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. grew EPS 119. 6% year-over-year, compared to -145. 9% for Grupo Supervielle S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the more profitable company, earning 66. 8% net margin versus -2. 4% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — meaning it keeps 66. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLX leads at 66. 8% versus -4. 8% for SUPV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLX leads at 93. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. (GGAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. 's 0. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. (GGAL) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S. A. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GGAL: 39. 9% to $60. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Grupo Financiero Galicia S. A. (GGAL) offers the highest yield at 6. 9%, versus 2. 1% for Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR).
09Is BLX or SUPV or GGAL or BBAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Latinoamericano de Comercio Exterior, S.
A. (BLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 4. 6% yield, +202. 0% 10Y return). Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLX: +202. 0%, SUPV: -18. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLX and SUPV and GGAL and BBAR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLX is a small-cap deep-value stock; SUPV is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GGAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; BBAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.