Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BMA vs SUPV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • AR
Market Cap$4.84B
5Y Perf.+348.5%
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • AR
Market Cap$765M
5Y Perf.+343.7%

BMA vs SUPV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BMA logoBMA
SUPV logoSUPV
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$4.84B$765M
Revenue (TTM)$6.46T$2.33T
Net Income (TTM)$291.41B$-48.45B
Gross Margin68.3%39.5%
Operating Margin5.6%-4.8%
Forward P/E0.0x0.0x
Total Debt$465.41B$1.05T
Cash & Equiv.$2.78T$1.60T

BMA vs SUPVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BMA
SUPV
StockMay 20May 26Return
Banco Macro S.A. (BMA)100448.5+348.5%
Grupo Supervielle S… (SUPV)100443.7+343.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BMA vs SUPV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SUPV leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Banco Macro S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
The Banking Pick

BMA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 6.8%
  • 56.3% 10Y total return vs SUPV's -17.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.76, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 0.51x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
The Banking Pick

SUPV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth -145.9%
  • NIM 12.1% vs BMA's 11.1%
  • 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BMA's -33.3%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSUPV logoSUPV13.7% NII/revenue growth vs BMA's -33.3%
ValueSUPV logoSUPVLower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x)
Quality / MarginsSUPV logoSUPVEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BMA's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBMA logoBMABeta 1.76 vs SUPV's 2.51, lower leverage
DividendsBMA logoBMA6.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SUPV's 3.6%
Momentum (1Y)BMA logoBMA-6.5% vs SUPV's -38.8%
Efficiency (ROA)SUPV logoSUPVEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs BMA's 0.6%

BMA vs SUPV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBMALAGGINGSUPV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BMA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

BMA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.46T annually — 2.8x SUPV's $2.33T. BMA is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUPV's -2.4%.

MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.46T$2.33T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$620.9B-$73.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$291.4B-$48.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.44T-$725.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.3%+39.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.6%-4.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%-2.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.3%-48.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-136.4%-157.4%
BMA leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SUPV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
Market CapShares × price$4.8B$765M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$371M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.07x-18.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x0.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.41x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.04x0.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.69x1.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.49x
SUPV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BMA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BMA delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-5 for SUPV. BMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUPV's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMA scores 6/9 vs SUPV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.1%-5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%-5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.5%-2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–962
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x1.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.31T-$549.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.78T$1.60T
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$465.4B$1.05T
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.28x-0.11x
BMA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BMA five years ago would be worth $69,454 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,009 for SUPV. Over the past 12 months, BMA leads with a -6.5% total return vs SUPV's -38.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BMA at 70.7% vs SUPV's 58.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-11.6%-24.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.5%-38.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+397.7%+299.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+594.5%+420.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.3%-17.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+70.7%+58.7%
BMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUPV's 2.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMA currently trades 72.5% from its 52-week high vs SUPV's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.76x2.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$106.15$16.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$38.30$4.54
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.5%+51.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.336.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded364K841K
BMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BMA and SUPV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates BMA as "Buy" and SUPV as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 68.9% upside for BMA (target: $130) vs -19.9% for SUPV (target: $7). For income investors, BMA offers the higher dividend yield at 6.81% vs SUPV's 3.59%.

MetricBMA logoBMABanco Macro S.A.SUPV logoSUPVGrupo Supervielle…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuySell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$130.00$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.8%+3.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$7302.65$437.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — BMA and SUPV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BMA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SUPV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBanco Macro S.A. (BMA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BMA vs SUPV: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BMA or SUPV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Grupo Supervielle S.

A. (SUPV) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 3% for Banco Macro S. A. (BMA). Banco Macro S. A. (BMA) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco Macro S. A. (BMA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BMA or SUPV?

On forward P/E, Grupo Supervielle S.

A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BMA or SUPV?

Over the past 5 years, Banco Macro S.

A. (BMA) delivered a total return of +594. 5%, compared to +420. 1% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BMA returned +56. 3% versus SUPV's -17. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BMA or SUPV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banco Macro S.

A. (BMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 76β versus Grupo Supervielle S. A. 's 2. 51β — meaning SUPV is approximately 43% more volatile than BMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco Macro S. A. (BMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 104% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BMA or SUPV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grupo Supervielle S.

A. (SUPV) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -33. 3% for Banco Macro S. A. (BMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco Macro S. A. grew EPS -44. 6% year-over-year, compared to -145. 9% for Grupo Supervielle S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BMA or SUPV?

Banco Macro S.

A. (BMA) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -2. 4% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMA leads at 5. 6% versus -4. 8% for SUPV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMA leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BMA or SUPV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Grupo Supervielle S.

A. (SUPV) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 0x for Banco Macro S. A. — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMA: 68. 9% to $130. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BMA or SUPV?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Banco Macro S. A. (BMA) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 3. 6% for Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV).

09

Is BMA or SUPV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco Macro S.

A. (BMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 8% yield). Grupo Supervielle S. A. (SUPV) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMA: +56. 3%, SUPV: -17. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BMA and SUPV?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BMA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SUPV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BMA and SUPV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BMA: -33.3% · SUPV: 13.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.