Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Communication Equipment
Computer Hardware
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $30M | $734M | $2.48B | $361M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $548M | $475M | $387M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-115M | $43M | $64M |
| Gross Margin | 92.7% | 43.1% | 63.4% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | -106.9% | -13.9% | 13.2% | -24.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 72.5x | 26.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $250K | $27M | $180M | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $95M | $22M | $96M |
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 51.5 | -48.5% |
| Digi International … (DGII) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
| 3D Systems Corporat… (DDD) | 100 | 23.0 | -77.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.43, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 17.77x
- 5.3% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1%
SSYS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.82, current ratio 3.57x
DGII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.35
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth 77.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 497.5% 10Y total return vs BMR's -40.9%
- Beta 1.35 vs DDD's 3.06
DDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 26.9x)
- 16.7% margin vs BMR's -103.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs BMR's -32.6%, ROIC -28.8% vs -50.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 26.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs BMR's -103.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.35 vs DDD's 3.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.4% vs BMR's -27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs BMR's -32.6%, ROIC -28.8% vs -50.8% |
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DGII leads in 3 of 6 categories
DDD leads 1 • BMR leads 0 • SSYS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGII leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $548M annually — 90.0x BMR's $6M. DDD is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BMR's -103.7%. On growth, DGII holds the edge at +25.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $548M | $475M | $387M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$44M | $90M | -$78M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$115M | $43M | $64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$10M | $127M | -$98M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.7% | +43.1% | +63.4% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -106.9% | -13.9% | +13.2% | -24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -103.7% | -21.0% | +9.1% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.6% | -1.8% | +26.7% | -25.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | -2.5% | +25.1% | -4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.5% | -55.6% | +3.6% | +116.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BMR and SSYS and DGII and DDD each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, DDD trades at a 79% valuation discount to DGII's 60.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $734M | $2.5B | $361M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $666M | $2.6B | $326M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | -6.66x | 60.91x | 13.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 72.51x | 26.89x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.97x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 29.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.88x | 1.33x | 5.76x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.82x | 3.90x | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 23.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DDD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDD delivers a 30.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-35 for BMR. BMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DGII's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSYS scores 6/9 vs BMR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.6% | -13.4% | +6.7% | +30.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.6% | -10.5% | +4.8% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.8% | -5.8% | +5.7% | -28.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.3% | -6.6% | +7.3% | -22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.28x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$68M | $158M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $95M | $22M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $250,000 | $27M | $180M | $61M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.50x | — | 21.93x | 51.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DGII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DGII five years ago would be worth $37,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,390 for DDD. Over the past 12 months, DGII leads with a +105.4% total return vs BMR's -27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DGII at 28.2% vs DDD's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | -5.4% | +52.4% | +33.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.0% | -23.5% | +105.4% | +9.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | -40.6% | +110.5% | -72.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | -54.3% | +275.5% | -86.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | -59.0% | +497.5% | -80.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | -16.0% | +28.2% | -35.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DGII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DGII is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDD's 3.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DGII currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs BMR's 45.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.43x | 1.82x | 1.35x | 3.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.32 | $12.81 | $69.81 | $3.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $7.34 | $30.20 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.1% | +66.5% | +94.2% | +65.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 42.6 | 76.3 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 101K | 831K | 269K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSYS as "Buy", DGII as "Buy", DDD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 102.4% upside for DDD (target: $5) vs 3.8% for DGII (target: $68).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.50 | $68.25 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 18 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DGII leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DDD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beamr Imaging Ltd.
(BMR) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
On trailing P/E, 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus Digi International Inc. at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Digi International Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
Over the past 5 years, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) delivered a total return of +275. 5%, compared to -86. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGII returned +497. 5% versus DDD's -80. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digi International Inc.
(DGII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus 3D Systems Corporation's 3. 06β — meaning DDD is approximately 126% more volatile than DGII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for Digi International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beamr Imaging Ltd.
(BMR) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 3D Systems Corporation grew EPS 109. 8% year-over-year, compared to -142. 8% for Beamr Imaging Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DGII leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
7% net margin versus -109. 4% for Beamr Imaging Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DGII leads at 13. 1% versus -104. 9% for BMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMR leads at 92. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) trades at 26. 9x forward P/E versus 72. 5x for Stratasys Ltd. — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DDD: 102. 4% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Digi International Inc.
(DGII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+497. 5% 10Y return). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) carries a higher beta of 3. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DGII: +497. 5%, DDD: -80. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMR and SSYS and DGII and DDD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DDD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.