Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $364M | $4.46B | $1.80B | $143M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.68B | $817M | $1.27B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $220M | $130M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 51.6% | 37.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.1% | 38.0% | 14.0% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.3x | 11.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $283M | $200M | $109M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $112M | $141M | $31M |
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes & Noble Educ… (BNED) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Grand Canyon Educat… (LOPE) | 100 | 168.5 | +68.5% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BNED lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LOPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth -0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- 272.4% 10Y total return vs STRA's 114.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 26.8%, current ratio 3.65x
STRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.46 vs LOPE's 2.27
- Better valuation composite
- 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs LOPE's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs LOPE's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 32.5% vs -13.4% |
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOPE leads in 3 of 6 categories
STRA leads 1 • BNED leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BNED is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 5.3x CHGG's $319M. LOPE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, BNED holds the edge at +7.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $817M | $1.3B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $102M | $341M | $216M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $220M | $130M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $260M | $174M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +51.6% | +37.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +38.0% | +14.0% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +26.9% | +10.2% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +31.8% | +13.7% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | -100.0% | +0.8% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.5% | +11.1% | +19.4% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, STRA trades at a 32% valuation discount to LOPE's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.94x vs LOPE's 2.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $364M | $4.5B | $1.8B | $143M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $638M | $4.6B | $1.8B | $196M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.27x | 21.33x | 14.59x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.30x | 11.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.97x | 1.94x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.84x | 13.25x | 7.22x | 12.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 4.04x | 1.42x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 6.17x | 1.10x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.71x | 11.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. STRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BNED's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs LOPE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.4% | +29.5% | +7.9% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +21.9% | +6.2% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +32.5% | +9.0% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +33.9% | +10.7% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | 0.27x | 0.07x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $274M | $88M | -$32M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $112M | $141M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $283M | $200M | $109M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.65x | — | — | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOPE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOPE five years ago would be worth $17,405 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $136 for BNED. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs LOPE's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOPE at 13.7% vs BNED's -59.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.6% | -15.2% | -7.8% | +79.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | +47.1% | +3.8% | -87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +74.1% | +17.8% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +272.4% | +114.9% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.4% | +13.7% | +1.3% | -49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BNED and LOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOPE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BNED currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs CHGG's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.35x | 0.48x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.21 | $223.04 | $93.45 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.90 | $149.37 | $69.70 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +73.7% | +84.6% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 44.7 | 47.3 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 231K | 244K | 315K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BNED as "Hold", LOPE as "Buy", STRA as "Buy", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs -77.7% for BNED (target: $2). STRA is the only dividend payer here at 3.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.38 | $182.33 | $87.00 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 18 | 18 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +5.9% | +7.7% | 0.0% |
LOPE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BNED vs LOPE vs STRA vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
On trailing P/E, Strategic Education, Inc.
(STRA) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 46x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 27x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) delivered a total return of +74. 1%, compared to -98. 6% for Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. (BNED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOPE returned +272. 4% versus BNED's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 738% more volatile than LOPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 104% for Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. grew EPS 89. 3% year-over-year, compared to -0. 3% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOPE leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOPE leads at 27. 5% versus -16. 8% for CHGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHGG leads at 60. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BNED, LOPE, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BNED or LOPE or STRA or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategic Education, Inc.
(STRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 3. 2% yield, +114. 9% 10Y return). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRA: +114. 9%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BNED and LOPE and STRA and CHGG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BNED (Consumer Cyclical) and LOPE (Consumer Defensive) and STRA (Consumer Defensive) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BNED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOPE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. STRA pays a dividend while BNED, LOPE, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.