Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Conglomerates
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $353M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $905M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $113M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-231K | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-227M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 16.5x | 150.4x |
| Total Debt | $100M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $1.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $68M |
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Omaha Corpor… (BOC) | 100 | 68.6 | -31.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 82.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 17.8%, current ratio 2.14x
- Beta 0.30 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs CODI's 53.7%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4%
- 24.3% margin vs CODI's -12.3%
- 19.8% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.0%
DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 0.9%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 150.4x)
- 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CODI's 4.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +7.7% vs CODI's -30.3%
CODI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.09, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.42x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 150.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs CODI's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CODI's 4.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.0% |
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
DIS leads 1 • BOC leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 863.8x BOC's $113M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODI's -12.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $113M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$231,273 | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$227M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +17.6% | +6.5% | -5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.8% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 55% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BOC's 21.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $905M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $424M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -273.05x | 34.89x | 15.87x | -3.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 16.53x | 150.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.84x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 14.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.26x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 19.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. BOC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs CODI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -49.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.2% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 3.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $72M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $100M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.12x | 17.33x | 9.95x | -0.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,004 for BOC. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs BOC's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.0% | -3.0% | -2.8% | +158.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.5% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -30.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | +166.5% | +8.0% | -25.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.0% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +53.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.8% | +38.6% | +2.6% | -9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOC and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.75 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $17.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.03 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $4.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.1% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DIS and CODI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOC as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", CODI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for BOC (target: $17) vs 24.7% for CODI (target: $15). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 99 | 63 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.2% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +0.0% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BOC vs NFLX vs DIS vs CODI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -60. 0% for Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus BOC's -49. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus Compass Diversified's 1. 09β — meaning CODI is approximately 258% more volatile than BOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boston Omaha Corporation (BOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOC leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -7. 8% for BOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOC leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 133. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BOC: 51. 9% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI?
In this comparison, CODI (4.
2% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BOC, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOC or NFLX or DIS or CODI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, CODI: +53. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOC and NFLX and DIS and CODI?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOC (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and CODI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. DIS, CODI pay a dividend while BOC, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.