BODI vs PLNT

For growth investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) delivered a total return of -42. 9%, compared to -97. 2% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLNT returned +203. 6% versus BODI's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus The Beachbody Company, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning BODI is approximately 337% more volatile than PLNT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -39. 9% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. (BODI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beachbody Company, Inc. grew EPS 96. 1% year-over-year, compared to 31. 0% for Planet Fitness, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLNT leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -1. 1% for The Beachbody Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus 3. 2% for BODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLNT leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Planet Fitness, Inc.

(PLNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), +203. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLNT: +203. 6%, BODI: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BODI (Communication Services) and PLNT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BODI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLNT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.