Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $42M | $325M | $386M | $1.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $893M | $265M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-152M | $244M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 16.3% | 32.6% | 3.5% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | -41.0% | -6.8% | -82.4% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $514M | $508M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $64M | $208M | $98M |
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BranchOut Food Inc. (BOF) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| Oatly Group AB (OTLY) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 6.4 | -93.6% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 130.6%, EPS growth 15.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 108.8%
- 130.6% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
- +71.7% vs SMPL's -65.8%
OTLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs BOF's -49.8%
- 39.3% ROA vs BOF's -38.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -58.5%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.34
- 2.2% 10Y total return vs BOF's -23.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.34, current ratio 3.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.6% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs BOF's -49.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs BYND's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.7% vs SMPL's -65.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs BOF's -38.1%, ROIC -44.4% vs -58.5% |
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOF leads 1 • OTLY leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 129.2x BOF's $11M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOF's -49.8%. On growth, BOF holds the edge at +47.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $893M | $265M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$21M | -$187M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$152M | $244M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$28M | -$134M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +32.6% | +3.5% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.0% | -6.8% | -82.4% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -49.8% | -17.1% | +92.2% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.0% | -3.2% | -50.6% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.6% | +15.6% | -15.3% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +4.8% | +90.9% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BOF and OTLY and SMPL each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42M | $325M | $386M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $47M | $774M | $686M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.10x | -2.07x | -0.46x | 12.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 7.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 5.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.38x | 0.38x | 1.40x | 0.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.27x | 16.08x | — | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 7.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OTLY. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTLY's 26.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs BOF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | -4.3% | — | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.1% | -19.5% | +39.3% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.5% | -10.5% | -44.4% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -122.2% | -27.2% | -40.3% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 26.12x | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $449M | $300M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $64M | $208M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $514M | $508M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.59x | -1.41x | -11.47x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOF five years ago would be worth $7,675 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for BYND. Over the past 12 months, BOF leads with a +71.7% total return vs SMPL's -65.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOF at -8.4% vs BYND's -60.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -7.1% | -5.4% | -37.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.7% | -0.6% | -64.4% | -65.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.3% | -75.8% | -93.6% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.3% | -97.4% | -99.2% | -64.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.3% | -97.4% | -98.7% | +2.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | -37.7% | -60.0% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOF and SMPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BYND's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOF currently trades 68.7% from its 52-week high vs BYND's 10.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.56x | 1.82x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.95 | $18.84 | $7.69 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $9.26 | $0.50 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.7% | +55.3% | +10.8% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 40.3 | 51.7 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 64K | 60.4M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OTLY as "Hold", BYND as "Sell", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5247.5% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 40.6% for OTLY (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.64 | $44.55 | $18.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 21 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.2% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BOF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BOF vs OTLY vs BYND vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) is the stronger pick with 130. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) delivered a total return of -23. 3%, compared to -99. 2% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +2. 2% versus BYND's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus Beyond Meat, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning BYND is approximately 431% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 26% for Oatly Group AB — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BranchOut Food Inc.
(BOF) is pulling ahead at 130. 6% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oatly Group AB grew EPS 25. 5% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOF leads at 108. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -72. 9% for BranchOut Food Inc. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -84. 7% for BYND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 5247.
5% to $44. 55.
07Which pays a better dividend — BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BOF or OTLY or BYND or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
34)). Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMPL: +2. 2%, BYND: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BOF and OTLY and BYND and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BOF is a small-cap high-growth stock; OTLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.