BOKF vs IBOC vs FFIN vs CADE vs FIS

For growth investors, Cadence Bank (CADE) is the stronger pick with 32.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.

1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.

3%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Cadence Bank's 1. 41β — meaning CADE is approximately 86% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cadence Bank (CADE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cadence Bank (CADE) is pulling ahead at 32.

4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, CADE: +122. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (BOKF (Financial Services) and IBOC (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and CADE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CADE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.