Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $9M | $2.62B | $137M | $5.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $236M | $114M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-369M | $115K | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | 103.1% | 90.7% | 35.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -469.3% | -168.6% | -17.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 1.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $99M | $10M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $222M | $3M | $714M |
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt Biotherapeutic… (BOLT) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 181.7 | +81.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOLT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.01
- Beta 1.01 vs AGEN's 2.72
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +220.2% vs BOLT's -34.1%
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 10.4% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- 0.1% ROA vs BOLT's -47.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 188.1% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 52.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs BOLT's -433.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs BOLT's -433.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.2% vs BOLT's -34.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs BOLT's -47.1% |
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • BOLT leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.1% (AGEN) to -4.3% (BOLT). On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $236M | $114M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | -$391M | -$10M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$369M | $115,000 | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$489M | -$159M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +103.1% | +90.7% | +35.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -168.6% | -17.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -156.4% | +0.1% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -2.1% | -139.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -39.3% | +27.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.3% | +10.5% | +85.3% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BOLT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $2.6B | $137M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $2.5B | $145M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -7.90x | -1144.12x | -10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 1.85x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 10.60x | 1.20x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 4.43x | — | 6.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT delivers a -47.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-93 for BOLT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOLT's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -92.5% | -69.0% | — | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.1% | -35.3% | +0.1% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.0% | -64.1% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.7% | -42.1% | — | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 0.16x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | -$123M | $7M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $222M | $3M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $99M | $10M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -13.38x | 1.11x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $17,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $98 for BOLT. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +220.2% total return vs BOLT's -34.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.1% vs AGEN's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.7% | +11.6% | +20.4% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.1% | +220.2% | +31.0% | +107.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.8% | +31.0% | -87.8% | +48.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -13.7% | -93.1% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +52.9% | -93.5% | +188.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.9% | +9.4% | -50.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOLT and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BOLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs BOLT's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.95x | 2.72x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $28.72 | $7.34 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.91 | $7.06 | $2.71 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +90.5% | +53.0% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 60.9 | 54.7 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 1.2M | 800K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOLT as "Hold", RCUS as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.4% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 15.4% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $30.00 | $7.33 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 18 | 11 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AGEN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BOLT vs RCUS vs AGEN vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to -99. 0% for Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. (BOLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +188. 1% versus BOLT's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(BOLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 168% more volatile than BOLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 87% for Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -981. 8% for Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -433. 7% for Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -469. 3% for BOLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOLT leads at 103. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 88.
4% to $7. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BOLT or RCUS or AGEN or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(BOLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOLT: -99. 3%, AGEN: -93. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BOLT and RCUS and AGEN and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.